Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
How would you treat this accident and why
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tieguy" data-source="post: 94626" data-attributes="member: 1912"><p>First off I did not say the accident was avoidable I gave an example where it could be the fault of the motorcyclists and yet the driver could be charged with an avoidable accident. You assumed I past judgement. I don't have the detail required to definitively charge this accident.</p><p> </p><p>second If it comes down to the mirror issue then she should not wait until all traffic would be stopped behind her. the issue would be did she have the opportunity to see the motorcyclist in her mirrors and did she check her mirrors. the article does not give us that detail.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p>Thus I took this article , I told you why it did not have enough detail , I gave you a possible scenario where you could have the fault and an avoidability determination charged to each driver and I feel you then assumed I had passed judgement when I clearly stated I felt there was not enough information to make that judgement. You presented a blurb of an article. Were I to investigate this accident I would be marking out the scene to see where everyone was at, gathering eyewitness accounts, taking numerous pictures and measuring out the scene from every angle. Your two paragraph article is not enough information to compensate for a complete accident investigation.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tieguy, post: 94626, member: 1912"] First off I did not say the accident was avoidable I gave an example where it could be the fault of the motorcyclists and yet the driver could be charged with an avoidable accident. You assumed I past judgement. I don't have the detail required to definitively charge this accident. second If it comes down to the mirror issue then she should not wait until all traffic would be stopped behind her. the issue would be did she have the opportunity to see the motorcyclist in her mirrors and did she check her mirrors. the article does not give us that detail. Thus I took this article , I told you why it did not have enough detail , I gave you a possible scenario where you could have the fault and an avoidability determination charged to each driver and I feel you then assumed I had passed judgement when I clearly stated I felt there was not enough information to make that judgement. You presented a blurb of an article. Were I to investigate this accident I would be marking out the scene to see where everyone was at, gathering eyewitness accounts, taking numerous pictures and measuring out the scene from every angle. Your two paragraph article is not enough information to compensate for a complete accident investigation. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
How would you treat this accident and why
Top