Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
The Competition
FedEx Discussions
I challenge you all
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="FedExRookie" data-source="post: 1170689" data-attributes="member: 44400"><p>You are honestly saying after the mid '90s the company went straight down the crap hole? </p><p></p><p></p><p>Fredly, I am aware that just because we didn't do as good as we wanted, doesn't mean we didn't do good overall. From a corporate standpoint, if you lose $100 million in revenue but you still made $400 million that fiscal year, you want to try and compensate for that $100 million. That is why I say I understand that they want to make cuts. The fact we are still profitable with good numbers, once you figure out their accounting tricks they use to try and persuade us during the 'state of the station meetings, is why I think its absurd that they are using our HEALTH to subsidize the loss. </p><p></p><p>I get it, they lost money, and now they want to make up for that lost revenue. I also believe they are taking the wrong steps to make up for that lost revenue. </p><p></p><p>I didn't click you links, I am to lazy ATM, but going by the hyerplink text is it referring to all the FedEx entities? A lot of the growth is Ground show more profitability and some of the other entities getting out of the red or getting closer to getting out.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="FedExRookie, post: 1170689, member: 44400"] You are honestly saying after the mid '90s the company went straight down the crap hole? Fredly, I am aware that just because we didn't do as good as we wanted, doesn't mean we didn't do good overall. From a corporate standpoint, if you lose $100 million in revenue but you still made $400 million that fiscal year, you want to try and compensate for that $100 million. That is why I say I understand that they want to make cuts. The fact we are still profitable with good numbers, once you figure out their accounting tricks they use to try and persuade us during the 'state of the station meetings, is why I think its absurd that they are using our HEALTH to subsidize the loss. I get it, they lost money, and now they want to make up for that lost revenue. I also believe they are taking the wrong steps to make up for that lost revenue. I didn't click you links, I am to lazy ATM, but going by the hyerplink text is it referring to all the FedEx entities? A lot of the growth is Ground show more profitability and some of the other entities getting out of the red or getting closer to getting out. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
The Competition
FedEx Discussions
I challenge you all
Top