Actually, Fedex is way out in front of the law with its requirement that contractors own ar least 3.routes.
Read the bill. It doesn't mention anything about number of routes.Actually, Fedex is way out in front of the law with its requirement that contractors own ar least 3.routes.
Read the bill. It doesn't mention anything about number of routes.
I guess we'll see if Christie has a sack to go against his party.Read the bill. It doesn't mention anything about number of routes.
I think bbsam thinks Ground is untouchable. Maybe, maybe not. Fred can't buy everyone.
I guess we'll see if Christie has a sack to go against his party.
I think bbsam thinks Ground is untouchable. Maybe, maybe not. Fred can't buy everyone.
Read the bill. It doesn't mention anything about number of routes.
And what is exactly the context? Please explain oh wise one.Read the bill. It doesn't mention anything about number of routes.
Wow. It most certainly does. You just have to understand the context in which this bill resides.
This is the key paragraph. You are ass-uming outcome of that situation before it is litigated.The bill presumes an employee/emoyer relationship u less the contractor or recipient of the good or service can show otherwise.
This is the key paragraph. You are ass-uming outcome of that situation before it is litigated.
Ok. It has to do with the fact that all Ground contractors are incorporated. They are set up as a business entity. How many corporations are employees? Buy it doesn't end there. The 3 route requirement satisfies what the courts look for in a company in the management by the owner to generate a profit or absorb a loss. It is not pay based on hours or piece work or salary. Services are rendered by a company that has money invested in equipment and personnel in order to provide the good or service.
The bill presumes an employee/emoyer relationship u less the contractor or recipient of the good or service can show otherwise.
As I said. FedEx is way out front on this.
So in essence BB you are saying fedex fixed the scam so all is good? This doesn't make you nervous that it might get the snow ball rolling? If anyone thinks more than the way you do, it's politicians. As long as it benefits them.
It doesn't look like ground meets any of those listed criteria to be considered contractors.So in essence BB you are saying fedex fixed the scam so all is good? This doesn't make you nervous that it might get the snow ball rolling? If anyone thinks more than the way you do, it's politicians. As long as it benefits them.
Not at all. The snowball rolled a long time ago. This bill is aimed at the business model Ground used years ago and other companies use today. Ground has shown them the formula to continue to use contractors should they so choose.