Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="worldwide" data-source="post: 3325459" data-attributes="member: 2193">Not pretending about anything - It&#039;s about all of that - that&#039;s Business 101.&nbsp; No business is interested introducing new technology just for technology&#039;s sake or new services &amp; technology that increase costs - they would not stay in business.&nbsp; They introduce new services and technology that do all of the above - enhance customer service, reduce cost, increase share holder value, again - Business 101.&nbsp; UPS workers and customers are also UPS stockholders should they make the choice to own UPS shares and I&#039;m sure they are interested in seeing their investment grow.&nbsp; Are you against shareowners of companies and holders in 401(k)&#039;s seeing their investments grow and wanting the stock of companies they own innovate and grow?It&#039;s very telling that you&#039;ve failed to address what I&#039;ve asked.&nbsp; The only conclusion one can make is that you prefer UPS to stay status quo and not look at these new technologies and how they could help while letting the competition take advantage of what they can offer. Last try - which direction is better for UPS to follow, in your opinion? Keep on doing the same thing and don&#039;t change or find a way to adapt to changing business rules and conditions? What are your alternatives if drones and driverless vehicles are not looked at and pursued?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="worldwide, post: 3325459, member: 2193"] Not pretending about anything - It's about all of that - that's Business 101. No business is interested introducing new technology just for technology's sake or new services & technology that increase costs - they would not stay in business. They introduce new services and technology that do all of the above - enhance customer service, reduce cost, increase share holder value, again - Business 101. UPS workers and customers are also UPS stockholders should they make the choice to own UPS shares and I'm sure they are interested in seeing their investment grow. Are you against shareowners of companies and holders in 401(k)'s seeing their investments grow and wanting the stock of companies they own innovate and grow? It's very telling that you've failed to address what I've asked. The only conclusion one can make is that you prefer UPS to stay status quo and not look at these new technologies and how they could help while letting the competition take advantage of what they can offer. Last try - which direction is better for UPS to follow, in your opinion? Keep on doing the same thing and don't change or find a way to adapt to changing business rules and conditions? What are your alternatives if drones and driverless vehicles are not looked at and pursued? [/QUOTE]

Verification