Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
IBT on the cameras
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="542thruNthru" data-source="post: 5267297" data-attributes="member: 48491"><p>Again... that's about video recording. I know that a company can video record for safety and legitimate business reasons like theft.</p><p></p><p>"<em>On June 30, 2017, Young filed her First Amended Complaint (FAC), the operative pleading in this action, asserting four causes of action: defamation, invasion of privacy (intrusion), invasion of privacy (misappropriation of likeness), and invasion of privacy (false light). She alleged that a SmartDrive camera was on and recording her the entire time she drove since she began work and that her truck had a sleeper berth, "so that the camera [was], in effect, constantly filming plaintiff's bedroom as she [was] driving</em>." "</p><p></p><p>I see nothing in there about audio recording.</p><p></p><p>I also saw this..</p><p></p><p>"<em>Acceptance of the surveillance system was made a condition of their employment; no explicit permission from the drivers was sought."</em></p><p></p><p>like I said before. If they put it in the contract then I'll have to vote NO and vote out OZ asap. I honestly don't know why we are still debating this. Until it happens everything we say is just matter of opinion.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="542thruNthru, post: 5267297, member: 48491"] Again... that's about video recording. I know that a company can video record for safety and legitimate business reasons like theft. "[I]On June 30, 2017, Young filed her First Amended Complaint (FAC), the operative pleading in this action, asserting four causes of action: defamation, invasion of privacy (intrusion), invasion of privacy (misappropriation of likeness), and invasion of privacy (false light). She alleged that a SmartDrive camera was on and recording her the entire time she drove since she began work and that her truck had a sleeper berth, "so that the camera [was], in effect, constantly filming plaintiff's bedroom as she [was] driving[/I]." " I see nothing in there about audio recording. I also saw this.. "[I]Acceptance of the surveillance system was made a condition of their employment; no explicit permission from the drivers was sought."[/I] like I said before. If they put it in the contract then I'll have to vote NO and vote out OZ asap. I honestly don't know why we are still debating this. Until it happens everything we say is just matter of opinion. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
IBT on the cameras
Top