drivers who move such equipment or knowingly drive illegally do not understand the liability issues involved. you get in an accident and the company will have to pay millions if you injured or kill someone.
that's just for starters. the driver will lose his or her license and also face criminal charges such as criminal negligence and or vehicular manslaughter.
pass that info along to the freakin brown noses.
Yep. The bigger issue is the fact that a feeder manager would pressure an employee, not only pressure but direct he/she to knowingly break the law! Should be fired on the spot. Really want someone like this directing our business? He is also the type guy that keeps showing up like a bad penny(has quite a past....)
So you agree then that a Union driver who does knowingly that is illegal should be fired on the spot?
I asked the question of "who is responsible?" because I have a hazy recollection of the process. I actually used to audit this during compliance assessments. My hazy recollection is that the responsibility goes to the last driver or shifter or hub supervisor who dealt with the trailer. As soon as there is one package in the trailer during the hub operation, the responsibility shifts to the hub. The supervisor is supposed to check the road worthiness of the trailer prior to loading. But a driver or shifter should check it before putting it in the line up.
So you agree then that a Union driver who does knowingly that is illegal should be fired on the spot?
Are we speaking of a Teamster who notified his management team or of a Teamster that didn't notify his management team when we answer this question in a situation like the one raised by the OP? Did you mean this in a more general sense when a Teamster does something illegal? I understood the question to be a response to want to retire's comment that the Feeder Manager should be fired for DIRECTING a Teamster to break the law. Personally, I don't think that firing the Feeder Manager is appropriate but I don't think half of the attempted Terminations of Teamsters that I have seen are appropriate either. Go figure, they overreact to many things that flag in reports or have an impact on management's bonus compensation and fail to respond to many things that should be addressed because they don't flag in a report or have an impact on the management's bonus compensation.
Personally, I had this occur with a package car rather recently and I handed the DVIR to my Supervisor so he could sign off that I was being directed to use expired equipment. Along the line of thought expressed by cachsux, I reasoned that expired does not inherently necessitate that it is unsafe. I informed my Supervisor that is was begging for a law enforcement officer to pull me over for expired tags because the sticker colors were a visual indicator that the registration was expired.
If I had made contact with law enforcement or commercial enforcement then I would have dealt with my consequences. Philosophically, I realize that my Supervisor's signature does not relieve me of any legal responsibility. I did and do feel it relieves me of some responsibility with UPS insofar as discipline is concerned and the truth is that my job is on the line on a regular basis and commercial enforcement hasn't pulled me over so I made/make a judgment call about where to fight my battles. I can see where some might think I made a bad judgment call. I wasn't happy to be put in the situation and I wasn't entirely at ease with my judgment call. I do feel that every Teamster that was dispatched with that truck since it had expired should have been given a written counseling for improper Pre-Trip at a minimum but that is not my call nor my place to recommend.
Yep. The bigger issue is the fact that a feeder manager would pressure an employee, not only pressure but direct he/she to knowingly break the law! Should be fired on the spot. Really want someone like this directing our business? He is also the type guy that keeps showing up like a bad penny(has quite a past....)
So you agree then that a Union driver who does knowingly that is illegal should be fired on the spot?
come on with the rest of it......
Nothing more ... just wanted to know if you believed in equitable treatment or Double Standards?
Nothing more ... just wanted to know if you believed in equitable treatment or Double Standards?
Oh I believe. What I did say is that we shouldn't have an unscrupulous mgt person making decisions. He is that. That trailer made service and the circle of bad decisions, illegality and risk was complete.......just so his numbers didn't take a hit. Proud of that?
I am sure the feeder department will get heat but it is the hub manager that takes the hit initially. The hub has to reload. The feeder dept might not make service on the trailer and that is where they will take the hit.Oh I believe. What I did say is that we shouldn't have an unscrupulous mgt person making decisions. He is that. That trailer made service and the circle of bad decisions, illegality and risk was complete.......just so his numbers didn't take a hit. Proud of that?
Nothing to be proud of ... just another day in the bag.
Double Standards ... just as I thought. Nothing wrong with that since management enjoys Double Standards all the time.
As a prologue......There was an awful TT fatality here(not UPS) yesterday.. Closed the highway for a day, destroyed a bridge.....let's say our illegal trailer was involved or caused the fatality.......what would dawn bring today? See?