Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
J6 Hearing
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="bbsam" data-source="post: 5532996" data-attributes="member: 22662"><p>Is what you have written even close to what Tucker is putting out there?</p><p></p><p>And if we want to be technical about it…</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]420387[/ATTACH]</p><p>…the definition fits what we saw on TV. Do you not recall the stated mission? To prevent the certification of the vote? That would represent the “authority or government”, wouldn’t it? The clips Tucker is airing notwithstanding, can we really say that was not a violent act? </p><p></p><p>Folks may not like it, but “insurrection” is a term that justifiably can be applied to those people. “Patriots” is not such a term.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="bbsam, post: 5532996, member: 22662"] Is what you have written even close to what Tucker is putting out there? And if we want to be technical about it… [ATTACH type="full"]420387[/ATTACH] …the definition fits what we saw on TV. Do you not recall the stated mission? To prevent the certification of the vote? That would represent the “authority or government”, wouldn’t it? The clips Tucker is airing notwithstanding, can we really say that was not a violent act? Folks may not like it, but “insurrection” is a term that justifiably can be applied to those people. “Patriots” is not such a term. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
J6 Hearing
Top
