Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Jan Brewer may be an old hag, but at least she knows when to use common sense!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Overpaid Union Thug" data-source="post: 1285012" data-attributes="member: 198"><p>Maybe but one shouldn't have to lie in that situation. To me forcing someone via the courts, or, simply under the threat of being taken to court, to do something that violates their religion is tyranny disguised under the false flag of protecting gays from discrimination. If a gay couple walks into Chick fi a and is refused service by the manager simply because they are gay then that is definitely discrimination because the services provided by Chick fi a don't force the employee to violate any religion. Certainly not Christianity. There is nothing in The Bible about not being able to serve food to homosexuals. But if that same couple goes into a wedding related business or to a priest to help with their wedding then either should be able to politely decline because their services could definitely be construed as something that violates their religious beliefs. See the difference? That's what I'd want any laws dealing with this issue to address. It essentially would protect both sides from each other. </p><p></p><p>I think gays and those that support them need to take a step back and realize what they are doing is attempting to force their agendas down everyone's throats. And using discrimination as the platform from which to attack dissenters is a blatant attempt at doing an end around The First Amendment.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Overpaid Union Thug, post: 1285012, member: 198"] Maybe but one shouldn't have to lie in that situation. To me forcing someone via the courts, or, simply under the threat of being taken to court, to do something that violates their religion is tyranny disguised under the false flag of protecting gays from discrimination. If a gay couple walks into Chick fi a and is refused service by the manager simply because they are gay then that is definitely discrimination because the services provided by Chick fi a don't force the employee to violate any religion. Certainly not Christianity. There is nothing in The Bible about not being able to serve food to homosexuals. But if that same couple goes into a wedding related business or to a priest to help with their wedding then either should be able to politely decline because their services could definitely be construed as something that violates their religious beliefs. See the difference? That's what I'd want any laws dealing with this issue to address. It essentially would protect both sides from each other. I think gays and those that support them need to take a step back and realize what they are doing is attempting to force their agendas down everyone's throats. And using discrimination as the platform from which to attack dissenters is a blatant attempt at doing an end around The First Amendment. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Jan Brewer may be an old hag, but at least she knows when to use common sense!
Top