It's funny my dad (in his early 80's) and I were talking about that day a few months back and we both were in the car driving from Athens Ga. to Anderson SC when the news broke over the radio and I remembered that event very clear. Somebody said "it's been 47 years!" and that was what my dad and I were so astonished at. WOW how time can fly.
In 1992' when the JFK movie came out, free market economist Murray Rothbard wrote a
piece about the movie and all the establishment hysteria that came from it and I think most here will remember that. As Rothbard correctly points out, the movie offered no new revelation at all but the hysteria did drive a point home that Rothbard asked in the closing paragraph and I have to agree is dead on the money!
One happy result of the film was the conclusive Stoneian argument: if everything is on the up and up, why not open up all the secret government files on the assassination?
If the whole thing is so airtight, that Oswald was the "lone nut" we are told he was, then why not put it all to rest, once and for all?
Of recent news although not unheard was Jesse Ventura's E. Howard Hunt angle and it's long been said of Hunt that way to begin with. Jesse does provide more footing for those who choose that angle. A year ago, Mass. College Professor Edward Curtin wrote a piece for GlobalResearch entitled,
"JFK and the Unspeakable: Why He Died and Why It Matters"
that covers a lot of ground as disclosed in the book by the same title written by
James Douglas. Again, one could argue that it's just another angle but all these angles do seem to always somehow intersect at the same location and here are those streets. CIA, Cuba, Vietnam, Military, Joint Chiefs. Now all the other stuff, one might cast a non caring eye and be OK in doing so but when I look across the spectrum as all these ideas and theories and where they dissect from one another, they still all always intersect with one another on the above mentioned 5. Now when I look at history prior too and then history yet still after, 3 of those 5 end up always as major players in the direction of our gov't and where we often go and end up. Global events even can also be directly traced to 3 of these 5 and where there is smoke, there is heat and ultimately there is fire.
And this gets back to Rothbard's assertion of just opening everything up so so Oswald and the whole establishment truth as being the only truth but yet who is the party(s) that keep all this stuff classified still? 3 of the 5 again? Hmmm?
If a private entity or person(s) were doing this, they'd be guilty as hell in the eyes of the public yet it is private individuals who become public figures so why do public figures (former private individuals) get a pass when they act like private guilty parties?
You also need to loose the illusion that when a person is choosen and enters public service/life, that they have some Damascus road experience and go through a major moral conversion thus making them above how would we judge and see them in the private world. It's another reason the same moral/ethical standards that are held and expected in private life also and even moreso apply and should be held to a higher level in public life. A gang of thieves and debased persons in the private world will be even worse in the public world because now they own the right of exclusive force and regardless of which political team you back, what do you all in common complain about being elected time after time after time? Think about it!
