Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Jobs
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Babagounj" data-source="post: 868934" data-attributes="member: 12952"><p>[h=2]<a href="http://biggovernment.com/dmitchell/2011/08/20/when-an-american-company-redomiciles-to-the-cayman-islands-what-lesson-should-we-learn/" target="_blank">When an American Company Redomiciles to the Cayman Islands, What Lesson Should We Learn?</a>[/h]Another American company has decided to expatriate for tax reasons. This process has been going on for decades, with companies giving up their U.S. charters (a form of business citizenship) and redomiciling in low-tax jurisdictions such as Bermuda, Ireland, Switzerland, Panama, Hong Kong, and the Cayman Islands.</p><p>The companies that choose to expatriate usually fit a certain profile (this <a href="http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2010/07/17/americans-voting-with-their-feet-to-escape-obama-tax-oppression/" target="_blank">applies to individuals as well</a>). They earn a substantial share of their income in other countries and they are put at a competitive disadvantage because of America’s “worldwide” tax system.</p><p> More specifically, worldwide taxation requires firms to not only pay tax to foreign governments on their foreign-source income, but they are also supposed to pay additional tax on this income to the IRS – even though the money was not earned in America and even though their foreign-based competitors rarely are subject to this type of double taxation.</p><p> In this most recent example, an energy company with substantial operations in Asia moved its charter to the Cayman Islands, as <a href="http://www.digitaljournal.com/pr/395990" target="_blank">reported by digitaljournal.com</a>.</p><p></p><p style="margin-left: 20px">Greenfields Petroleum Corporation…, an independent exploration and production company with assets in Azerbaijan, is pleased to announce that the previously announced corporate redomestication…from Delaware to the Cayman Islands has been successfully completed.</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p><p>Because it is a small firm, the move by GPC probably won’t attract much attention from the politicians. But “corporate expatriation” has generated <a href="http://www.heritage.org/Research/Commentary/2002/05/Bad-Tax-Policy-You-Can-Run133" target="_blank">considerable controversy in recent years</a> when involving big companies such as Ingersoll-Rand, Transocean, and Stanley Works (now Stanley Black & Decker).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Babagounj, post: 868934, member: 12952"] [h=2][URL="http://biggovernment.com/dmitchell/2011/08/20/when-an-american-company-redomiciles-to-the-cayman-islands-what-lesson-should-we-learn/"]When an American Company Redomiciles to the Cayman Islands, What Lesson Should We Learn?[/URL][/h]Another American company has decided to expatriate for tax reasons. This process has been going on for decades, with companies giving up their U.S. charters (a form of business citizenship) and redomiciling in low-tax jurisdictions such as Bermuda, Ireland, Switzerland, Panama, Hong Kong, and the Cayman Islands. The companies that choose to expatriate usually fit a certain profile (this [URL="http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2010/07/17/americans-voting-with-their-feet-to-escape-obama-tax-oppression/"]applies to individuals as well[/URL]). They earn a substantial share of their income in other countries and they are put at a competitive disadvantage because of America’s “worldwide” tax system. More specifically, worldwide taxation requires firms to not only pay tax to foreign governments on their foreign-source income, but they are also supposed to pay additional tax on this income to the IRS – even though the money was not earned in America and even though their foreign-based competitors rarely are subject to this type of double taxation. In this most recent example, an energy company with substantial operations in Asia moved its charter to the Cayman Islands, as [URL="http://www.digitaljournal.com/pr/395990"]reported by digitaljournal.com[/URL]. [INDENT]Greenfields Petroleum Corporation…, an independent exploration and production company with assets in Azerbaijan, is pleased to announce that the previously announced corporate redomestication…from Delaware to the Cayman Islands has been successfully completed. [/INDENT] Because it is a small firm, the move by GPC probably won’t attract much attention from the politicians. But “corporate expatriation” has generated [URL="http://www.heritage.org/Research/Commentary/2002/05/Bad-Tax-Policy-You-Can-Run133"]considerable controversy in recent years[/URL] when involving big companies such as Ingersoll-Rand, Transocean, and Stanley Works (now Stanley Black & Decker). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Jobs
Top