Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="trplnkl" data-source="post: 928003" data-attributes="member: 13254"> Living in the area that I do, I have seen many pipe lines crisscross the state. In all that I have personally seen ranches and farms are marginally ill effected. No one losses their ranch or farm, just the use of part of it for a period of time, they then resume normal activities. As far as citizens and businesses being lost it is minimal also. I&#039;ve never seen a major pipe line go through an existing community, not saying it hasn&#039;t or couldn&#039;t happen but have never seen it happen. The pipeline will not displace what is already there but in very few instances. With all that said, I am basically not for imminent domain and believe that if ID is to be used anywhere, there should be some major changes made. Instead of ID law providing for &quot;fair market value&quot;, maybe a &quot;replacement value&quot; instead. </blockquote>

[QUOTE="trplnkl, post: 928003, member: 13254"] [COLOR=#8b4513][FONT=comic sans ms][I][B] Living in the area that I do, I have seen many pipe lines crisscross the state. In all that I have personally seen ranches and farms are marginally ill effected. No one losses their ranch or farm, just the use of part of it for a period of time, they then resume normal activities. As far as citizens and businesses being lost it is minimal also. I've never seen a major pipe line go through an existing community, not saying it hasn't or couldn't happen but have never seen it happen. The pipeline will not displace what is already there but in very few instances. With all that said, I am basically not for imminent domain and believe that if ID is to be used anywhere, there should be some major changes made. Instead of ID law providing for "fair market value", maybe a "replacement value" instead. [/B][/I][/FONT][/COLOR] [/QUOTE]

Verification