Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Judge Napolitano Ask What If......
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="The Other Side" data-source="post: 884707" data-attributes="member: 17969"><p>What if this maroon was a hypocrite?</p><p></p><p>Bush executive orderOn June 23, 2006, the first anniversary of the <em>Kelo</em> decision (see above), President George W. Bush issued Executive Order 13406 which stated in Section I that the federal government must limit its use of taking private property for "public use" with "just compensation", which is also stated in the constitution, for the "purpose of benefiting the general public." The order limits this use by stating that it may not be used "for the purpose of advancing the economic interest of private parties to be given ownership or use of the property taken".[SUP]<span style="font-size: 10px">[15]</span>[/SUP] However, eminent domain is more often exercised by local and state governments, albeit often with funds obtained from the federal government.</p><p></p><p></p><p>The judge supported bush's actions with respect to eminent domain while bush and his colleagues took personal property during his administration.</p><p></p><p>I laugh at this two faced sell out maroon.</p><p></p><p>Peace.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="The Other Side, post: 884707, member: 17969"] What if this maroon was a hypocrite? Bush executive orderOn June 23, 2006, the first anniversary of the [I]Kelo[/I] decision (see above), President George W. Bush issued Executive Order 13406 which stated in Section I that the federal government must limit its use of taking private property for "public use" with "just compensation", which is also stated in the constitution, for the "purpose of benefiting the general public." The order limits this use by stating that it may not be used "for the purpose of advancing the economic interest of private parties to be given ownership or use of the property taken".[SUP][SIZE=2][15][/SIZE][/SUP] However, eminent domain is more often exercised by local and state governments, albeit often with funds obtained from the federal government. The judge supported bush's actions with respect to eminent domain while bush and his colleagues took personal property during his administration. I laugh at this two faced sell out maroon. Peace. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Judge Napolitano Ask What If......
Top