Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Jones" data-source="post: 4681806" data-attributes="member: 4805">A Pennsylvania postal worker who initially alleged that a postmaster had tampered with mail ballots — an accusation embraced by Republicans as evidence of an unfair election — told federal investigators in a recorded interview that his sworn <a href="https://getliberty.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/NOTARIZE-Affidavit.RichardHopkins.pdf" target="_blank">affidavit</a> had been written by Project Veritas, and that he could no longer stand by his statement.&quot;I didn&#039;t specifically overhear the whole story. I just heard a part of it,&quot; Hopkins said in the recording. &quot;And I could have missed a lot of it.&quot;&quot;My mind probably added the rest. I understand that,&quot; he said at another point, adding: &quot;All it is is hearsay, and that&#039;s the worst part.&quot;When an agent asked Hopkins in the recording if he would still swear to the affidavit&#039;s claim that the postmaster &quot;was back-dating ballots,&quot; he replied: &quot;At this point? No.&quot;Hopkins also told the federal agents that the affidavit, which he signed under penalty of law and which was later provided to the Trump campaign and Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., had been written by Project Veritas.Because he had signed the document in a state of &quot;so much shock,&quot; Hopkins said, &quot;I wasn&#039;t paying that much attention to what [Project Veritas] were telling me.&quot;[URL unfurl=&quot;true&quot;]https://news.yahoo.com/project-veritas-could-face-legal-110001713.html[/URL]</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Jones, post: 4681806, member: 4805"] [I]A Pennsylvania postal worker who initially alleged that a postmaster had tampered with mail ballots — an accusation embraced by Republicans as evidence of an unfair election — told federal investigators in a recorded interview that his sworn [URL='https://getliberty.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/NOTARIZE-Affidavit.RichardHopkins.pdf']affidavit[/URL] had been written by Project Veritas, and that he could no longer stand by his statement. "I didn't specifically overhear the whole story. I just heard a part of it," Hopkins said in the recording. "And I could have missed a lot of it." "My mind probably added the rest. I understand that," he said at another point, adding: "All it is is hearsay, and that's the worst part." When an agent asked Hopkins in the recording if he would still swear to the affidavit's claim that the postmaster "was back-dating ballots," he replied: "At this point? No." Hopkins also told the federal agents that the affidavit, which he signed under penalty of law and which was later provided to the Trump campaign and Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., had been written by Project Veritas. Because he had signed the document in a state of "so much shock," Hopkins said, "I wasn't paying that much attention to what [Project Veritas] were telling me."[/I] [URL unfurl="true"]https://news.yahoo.com/project-veritas-could-face-legal-110001713.html[/URL] [/QUOTE]

Verification