Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="vantexan" data-source="post: 5513300" data-attributes="member: 24302">You say the government has the right to stop what they think is misinformation?&nbsp; What if the government is wrong?&nbsp; For example vaccines.&nbsp; People were kicked off Twitter for questioning the safety and efficacy of the vaccines.&nbsp; Turns out there have been tens of thousands of adverse effects listed on the government VAERS website.&nbsp; And it is well documented that the vaccines do not stop infection and transmission, which the government repeatedly said they did.&nbsp; This is what you aren&#039;t getting.&nbsp; There should be robust debate from all sides.&nbsp; Not one side trying to control the narrative and shut down dissenters.&nbsp; That&#039;s authoritarian.&nbsp; Did the executives at Twitter have a lock on what is true?&nbsp; Or were they acting on behalf of the party they supported to control public perception of what was deemed true and acceptable by them?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="vantexan, post: 5513300, member: 24302"] You say the government has the right to stop what they think is misinformation? What if the government is wrong? For example vaccines. People were kicked off Twitter for questioning the safety and efficacy of the vaccines. Turns out there have been tens of thousands of adverse effects listed on the government VAERS website. And it is well documented that the vaccines do not stop infection and transmission, which the government repeatedly said they did. This is what you aren't getting. There should be robust debate from all sides. Not one side trying to control the narrative and shut down dissenters. That's authoritarian. Did the executives at Twitter have a lock on what is true? Or were they acting on behalf of the party they supported to control public perception of what was deemed true and acceptable by them? [/QUOTE]

Verification