Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Liberal / Conservative
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="wkmac" data-source="post: 710442" data-attributes="member: 2189"><p>What is a liberal in it's historical sense? Notice the ethmology being the point.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>What is a conservative in it's historical sense?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The conservative definition lacks the ethmology that the word liberal had so let's look at the root word of conservative, the word conserve and notice the ethmology. The ethmology being the equalizer in the debate of what is what.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Which one of these classifications would be about letting the individual be free, decide for themselves and would want to be unshackled from an large entity who seeks by it's own authority to limit the individual of his/her freedom no matter how one might choose to express that? On the flipside, which one of these would not only want to enforce and maintain the status quo but would also use authority and rigidity in society in order to limit the individual of choices and mandate structure in order to "preserve" what is already in place? Which one regardless of political/social/economic cause would resort to the use of authority and state power to achieve an ends and which one might allow individuals to wash out their own conflicts among themselves in some form or free society? Don't answer using today's created construct of terms but rather using the historical ethmology of the words as guide!</p><p></p><p>I contend that in the historical usage of the terms, neither side who use these terms (co-op) for themselves truly fit the term liberal and that bothsides more fit the historical ethmology and even contemporary definitions in the conserve context. The reason bothsides pretend the illusion of difference is that the voter thinks (manipulated to believe) they want a multi choice of Wendy's, McDonald's, BurgerKing, Sonic, Jack-n-the-Box, SteaknShake or my personal favorite Rhea's or a Varsity Glorified and ChiliSlaw Dog. Uh, you can't get those last 2 where you live? Life must be a complete 8itch!</p><p><img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/FeltTip/happy-very.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":happy-very:" title="Happy Very :happy-very:" data-shortname=":happy-very:" /></p><p></p><p>But in truth when you walk into that voting booth and pick between the so-called "liberal" candidate and the "conservative" candidate, you're not picking from a variety like choosing a different hamburger joint but in truth you've just picked for yourself a plate of ...............!</p><p></p><p>And then after making your selection, you'll to the death defend just how juicy and delicious it is never realizing you're all eating the very same thing! Reminds me of the 1980's Genesis song "Land of Confusion" as the title does rightly describe what we are.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="wkmac, post: 710442, member: 2189"] What is a liberal in it's historical sense? Notice the ethmology being the point. What is a conservative in it's historical sense? The conservative definition lacks the ethmology that the word liberal had so let's look at the root word of conservative, the word conserve and notice the ethmology. The ethmology being the equalizer in the debate of what is what. Which one of these classifications would be about letting the individual be free, decide for themselves and would want to be unshackled from an large entity who seeks by it's own authority to limit the individual of his/her freedom no matter how one might choose to express that? On the flipside, which one of these would not only want to enforce and maintain the status quo but would also use authority and rigidity in society in order to limit the individual of choices and mandate structure in order to "preserve" what is already in place? Which one regardless of political/social/economic cause would resort to the use of authority and state power to achieve an ends and which one might allow individuals to wash out their own conflicts among themselves in some form or free society? Don't answer using today's created construct of terms but rather using the historical ethmology of the words as guide! I contend that in the historical usage of the terms, neither side who use these terms (co-op) for themselves truly fit the term liberal and that bothsides more fit the historical ethmology and even contemporary definitions in the conserve context. The reason bothsides pretend the illusion of difference is that the voter thinks (manipulated to believe) they want a multi choice of Wendy's, McDonald's, BurgerKing, Sonic, Jack-n-the-Box, SteaknShake or my personal favorite Rhea's or a Varsity Glorified and ChiliSlaw Dog. Uh, you can't get those last 2 where you live? Life must be a complete 8itch! :happy-very: But in truth when you walk into that voting booth and pick between the so-called "liberal" candidate and the "conservative" candidate, you're not picking from a variety like choosing a different hamburger joint but in truth you've just picked for yourself a plate of ...............! And then after making your selection, you'll to the death defend just how juicy and delicious it is never realizing you're all eating the very same thing! Reminds me of the 1980's Genesis song "Land of Confusion" as the title does rightly describe what we are. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Liberal / Conservative
Top