Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Local 25 Teamsters borderline criminal act?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Inthegame" data-source="post: 3912573" data-attributes="member: 37112"><p>Ok but you've missed the point. </p><p></p><p>PT CW states "If Local 25 knew UPS was not turning in dues applications and did nothing that would be on them". My response is clear. The local only becomes aware of new hires after UPS conveys that info. Delaying that process puts employees in arrears and in my experience very few employees pay back dues once peak is over and they're laid off. </p><p></p><p>In the past few years, UPS is employing this tactic in many locations, costing local unions, and their members, contractual dues obligations. </p><p></p><p>When grievances are filed, the predicable company response is the laid off employee, not UPS, is responsible for any shortage.</p><p></p><p>It appears L25 attempted to circumvent UPS's tactic by making needed seasonal employment untenable. </p><p></p><p>It should be noted this hadn't happened in past peaks when UPS followed the contractual procedure of expeditious notification of hires.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Inthegame, post: 3912573, member: 37112"] Ok but you've missed the point. PT CW states "If Local 25 knew UPS was not turning in dues applications and did nothing that would be on them". My response is clear. The local only becomes aware of new hires after UPS conveys that info. Delaying that process puts employees in arrears and in my experience very few employees pay back dues once peak is over and they're laid off. In the past few years, UPS is employing this tactic in many locations, costing local unions, and their members, contractual dues obligations. When grievances are filed, the predicable company response is the laid off employee, not UPS, is responsible for any shortage. It appears L25 attempted to circumvent UPS's tactic by making needed seasonal employment untenable. It should be noted this hadn't happened in past peaks when UPS followed the contractual procedure of expeditious notification of hires. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Local 25 Teamsters borderline criminal act?
Top