Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="WorkingAsDirected" data-source="post: 3698272" data-attributes="member: 72121">I read the local 705 initial proposal and no changes were made regarding employee bonuses (section 55.2) Now this may be because of two reasons:&nbsp; The agreement was already clearly written and didn&#039;t have to be changed or the union is not working in the best interest of the employee. From what I have been told by my BA and read on this forum, bonuses went into arbitration and lost which happened somewhere in the west coast.&nbsp; I believe arbitration lost because the language of the contract in that area my have been vague and weak.&nbsp; So does that ruling apply to all area&#039;s that have a different contract with different language.? I think local 705 has the most clearly written language on bonuses.Regardless, the Union said this loophole would be fixed and we were lied to.&nbsp; If anyone has the written decision of said arbitration I would love to read it.[ATTACH=full]209094[/ATTACH]</blockquote>

[QUOTE="WorkingAsDirected, post: 3698272, member: 72121"] I read the local 705 initial proposal and no changes were made regarding employee bonuses (section 55.2) Now this may be because of two reasons: The agreement was already clearly written and didn't have to be changed or the union is not working in the best interest of the employee. From what I have been told by my BA and read on this forum, bonuses went into arbitration and lost which happened somewhere in the west coast. I believe arbitration lost because the language of the contract in that area my have been vague and weak. So does that ruling apply to all area's that have a different contract with different language.? I think local 705 has the most clearly written language on bonuses. Regardless, the Union said this loophole would be fixed and we were lied to. If anyone has the written decision of said arbitration I would love to read it.[ATTACH=full]209094[/ATTACH] [/QUOTE]

Verification