Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="JadedBull" data-source="post: 1295372" data-attributes="member: 52427">He probably did read it. Thanks to &quot;Local 804 news&quot; we can all read it. I am not sure you did though. Looks like you skipped what the arbitrator writes in this part:The language of the Agreement authorizes theUnion to engage in a job action only if the Company fails to abide by “the procedure for the settlement of disputes and differences,” and, as noted above, the Company abided by the settlement procedures.In the Melville decision, the Company abided, this time they did not. A few of us have pointed this out here. Why are you skipping that part of the decision? I pointed it out before.You are a union man rooting for us aren&#039;t you? You aren&#039;t one of those managers assigned to pose here and attack the Union are you? We all had a choice that day. We followed Liam and decided to take a stand, where UPS would like us to stay on our knees.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="JadedBull, post: 1295372, member: 52427"] He probably did read it. Thanks to "Local 804 news" we can all read it. I am not sure you did though. Looks like you skipped what the arbitrator writes in this part: [B]The language of the Agreement authorizes the Union to engage in a job action only if the Company fails to abide by “the procedure for the settlement of disputes and differences,” and, as noted above, the Company abided by the settlement procedures. [/B] In the Melville decision, the Company abided, this time they did not. A few of us have pointed this out here. Why are you skipping that part of the decision? I pointed it out before. You are a union man rooting for us aren't you? You aren't one of those managers assigned to pose here and attack the Union are you? We all had a choice that day. We followed Liam and decided to take a stand, where UPS would like us to stay on our knees. [/QUOTE]

Verification