There is no way in hell that I would interact with any of my supervisors via Facebook, that is a workplace disaster just waiting to happen.
If any of you have a facebook acct., this engagement with a UPS manager seems to be the position of MOST higher level management @ups.
If any of you have a facebook acct., this engagement with a UPS manager seems to be the position of MOST higher level management @ups.
I wonder if he posts on browncafe.com?
This is a very unsafe video. I watched about 4 minutes and I was almost bored to death.
Please be advised not to watch this video while operating heavy equipment or a vibrator. Injuries may occur.
Well, I guess I'll try to explain it to you.
The 1st company, Gulf Stream, cared enough about their employees to ask an EXPERT organization in health and safety to come in and help design the BEST power tools for their employees to prevent injuries and illnesses. Sounds like UPS could take a lesson or 2 from an organization that cares enough to do that for their workers.
It may not apply to you, but you should care enough about your fellow UPSers who do have issues at some of UPSs facilities who WANT someone OTHER than Liberty Mutual giving the A-OK!
And we all know UPS is very high on cost justification when it comes to operations. Just has to make sure it "says" that safety is the most importantNIOSH Immediately Dangerous To Life or Health Concentration (IDLH): 1,200 ppm
OSHA Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL): General Industry: 29 CFR 1910.1000 Z-1 Table -- 50 ppm
http://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table=INTERPRETATIONS&p_id=22333
57 ppm (average ppm over a continuous 7 hours) would be under the OSHA Time Weighted Average calculation used to determine permissible exposure limits.
57 ppm x (420/480) = 49.875 PEL TWA
I doubt the compassion of Gulf Stream prompted their actions. More likely they were having a high number of OSHA recordable injuries and high workers comp expense. Investing in tools that prevent injury related expense is a simple business move based upon cost justification.
Well, I guess I'll try to explain it to you.
The 1st company, Gulf Stream, cared enough about their employees to ask an EXPERT organization in health and safety to come in and help design the BEST power tools for their employees to prevent injuries and illnesses. Sounds like UPS could take a lesson or 2 from an organization that cares enough to do that for their workers.
It may not apply to you, but you should care enough about your fellow UPSers who do have issues at some of UPSs facilities who WANT someone OTHER than Liberty Mutual giving the A-OK!
I need a better mouse that doesn't hurt me.
NIOSH Immediately Dangerous To Life or Health Concentration (IDLH): 1,200 ppm
OSHA Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL): General Industry: 29 CFR 1910.1000 Z-1 Table -- 50 ppm
http://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table=INTERPRETATIONS&p_id=22333
57 ppm (average ppm over a continuous 7 hours) would be under the OSHA Time Weighted Average calculation used to determine permissible exposure limits.
57 ppm x (420/480) = 49.875 PEL TWA
I doubt the compassion of Gulf Stream prompted their actions. More likely they were having a high number of OSHA recordable injuries and high workers comp expense. Investing in tools that prevent injury related expense is a simple business move based upon cost justification.
I need a better mouse that doesn't hurt me.
I thought it was "I need a lover that won't drive me crazy"?"I need a woman that won`t drive me crazy"