Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="vantexan" data-source="post: 3327046" data-attributes="member: 24302"><p>So instead of looking at a career in totality, considering whether a person&#039;s track record is worthy of your vote, you look for anything in his past to latch onto to destroy him if he&#039;s on the opposite side of your politics.&nbsp; Reminds me of the army the Media sent to Wasilla, AK to dig up dirt on Sarah Palin.&nbsp; Personal growth, forgiveness, non of that factors into your world view because you&#039;ve got your gotcha moment.&nbsp; Meanwhile a candidate with negative issues too numerous to list here is considered worthy by you to be our next President but you don&#039;t extend that generosity to the opposition&#039;s deeply flawed candidate.&nbsp; And cover for her while talking about Republicans covering for Moore as the height of hypocrisy.&nbsp; We want the same thing you want, a candidate who will advocate our viewpoint on current issues.&nbsp; If while in office he can&#039;t control himself he should be removed.&nbsp; Expecting candidates with no personal flaws in their history would reduce the available candidates to nearly zero.</p></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="vantexan, post: 3327046, member: 24302"] So instead of looking at a career in totality, considering whether a person's track record is worthy of your vote, you look for anything in his past to latch onto to destroy him if he's on the opposite side of your politics. Reminds me of the army the Media sent to Wasilla, AK to dig up dirt on Sarah Palin. Personal growth, forgiveness, non of that factors into your world view because you've got your gotcha moment. Meanwhile a candidate with negative issues too numerous to list here is considered worthy by you to be our next President but you don't extend that generosity to the opposition's deeply flawed candidate. And cover for her while talking about Republicans covering for Moore as the height of hypocrisy. We want the same thing you want, a candidate who will advocate our viewpoint on current issues. If while in office he can't control himself he should be removed. Expecting candidates with no personal flaws in their history would reduce the available candidates to nearly zero. [/QUOTE]

Verification