Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
McCain Sez Answer to Corruption Is Smaller Gov't!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tieguy" data-source="post: 97767" data-attributes="member: 1912"><p>The increase of government is a good catch all with all the proper conotations. To do the debate justice though we probably should go through the increase of government, department by department and then determine if the increase was needed. </p><p> </p><p>We went to war in Afghanistan in response to 9/11. Justified yes. </p><p> </p><p>we went to war in Iraq for various reasons. Justified ?</p><p> </p><p>We created homeland security in response to 9/11 and in response to congressional investigations that determined the CIA and FBI needed to be in one department working together. Justified ?</p><p> </p><p>money well spent?</p><p> </p><p>Many americans want us to control the illegal immigration issue.</p><p> </p><p>Building a fence and patrolling the border will cost money. Funding for the SSA to investigate invalid Social security numbers or identity theft issues will cost more money. Money well spent?</p><p> </p><p>This is where Bush is extremely weak. He catches grief about increasing government and starts mamby pambying around about the line item veto trying to harp on the traiditional outdated republican response that the democrats in congress are tacking excesses on good bills. </p><p> </p><p>Stand up george . Tell us what you spent the money on and why you think it was well spent. Tell us what cuts you made in government and why you think that plan was sound. </p><p> </p><p>Too many games played in politics too many vague political references that confuse the issues.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tieguy, post: 97767, member: 1912"] The increase of government is a good catch all with all the proper conotations. To do the debate justice though we probably should go through the increase of government, department by department and then determine if the increase was needed. We went to war in Afghanistan in response to 9/11. Justified yes. we went to war in Iraq for various reasons. Justified ? We created homeland security in response to 9/11 and in response to congressional investigations that determined the CIA and FBI needed to be in one department working together. Justified ? money well spent? Many americans want us to control the illegal immigration issue. Building a fence and patrolling the border will cost money. Funding for the SSA to investigate invalid Social security numbers or identity theft issues will cost more money. Money well spent? This is where Bush is extremely weak. He catches grief about increasing government and starts mamby pambying around about the line item veto trying to harp on the traiditional outdated republican response that the democrats in congress are tacking excesses on good bills. Stand up george . Tell us what you spent the money on and why you think it was well spent. Tell us what cuts you made in government and why you think that plan was sound. Too many games played in politics too many vague political references that confuse the issues. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
McCain Sez Answer to Corruption Is Smaller Gov't!
Top