Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="refineryworker05" data-source="post: 3234169" data-attributes="member: 66082">Man it requires massive amounts of paper to coordinate anything. especially if you want someone to pick out certain organizations and leave in others. That would require some kind of formal official justification for why these organizations were picked and how they violated being a charity, and then it would require explaining the identifying characteristics of the organizations you wanted to block and why you were blocking them because you’d be allowing other organizations that seemingly break the rules within the official explanation alone. So, you’d have to tell people we are leaving them in because they aren’t republicans. And then when people objected and said I’m not breaking the law for you and I’m going to your supervisor.... I don’t know what that one person could have done to hold it all together. She must have blackmailed all those people to force them to break the law. Or maybe you believe that all of them would have done it cause they are out to get republicans as well. Then you’d have to monitor every person doing the blocking to make sure they were getting the right organizations. It would require corrections and more explantations for those corrections. It would have required micromanaging on an epic scale and all by one person according to you.Yeah there would have been a huge paper trail, a lot of witnesses and plenty of evidence.The fact that they found nothing.... and all you can come up with is one person pleading the fifth and not admitting to breaking the law through email as being able to stop this investigation makes no logical sense.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="refineryworker05, post: 3234169, member: 66082"] Man it requires massive amounts of paper to coordinate anything. especially if you want someone to pick out certain organizations and leave in others. That would require some kind of formal official justification for why these organizations were picked and how they violated being a charity, and then it would require explaining the identifying characteristics of the organizations you wanted to block and why you were blocking them because you’d be allowing other organizations that seemingly break the rules within the official explanation alone. So, you’d have to tell people we are leaving them in because they aren’t republicans. And then when people objected and said I’m not breaking the law for you and I’m going to your supervisor.... I don’t know what that one person could have done to hold it all together. She must have blackmailed all those people to force them to break the law. Or maybe you believe that all of them would have done it cause they are out to get republicans as well. Then you’d have to monitor every person doing the blocking to make sure they were getting the right organizations. It would require corrections and more explantations for those corrections. It would have required micromanaging on an epic scale and all by one person according to you. Yeah there would have been a huge paper trail, a lot of witnesses and plenty of evidence. The fact that they found nothing.... and all you can come up with is one person pleading the fifth and not admitting to breaking the law through email as being able to stop this investigation makes no logical sense. [/QUOTE]

Verification