Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Mutineer" data-source="post: 5486899" data-attributes="member: 69587">You&#039;re right, they did.AFTER they threw rocks onto the house, shot the dog, and then the boy.All while on private property they had no warrant to be on.Randy Weaver never fired a shot at anybody or anything. And as was revealed, the Marshals were the first to fire, which caused this entire incident!All over a bench warrant caused by a summons to appear with an incorrect (later) court date.Randy Weaver was odd. His wife was probably nutty. The dog and the boy were killed while justifiably defending themselves. And they were all living out in the middle of nowhere where odd, nutty people absolutely belong.I think it&#039;s likely there are people on this forum who delight in straw-manning Randy Weaver, and those like him, who have broken more serious laws than Randy Weaver and his entire family combined.In current terminology, this entire incident is even worse than what is known as a SWATting.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Mutineer, post: 5486899, member: 69587"] You're right, they did. AFTER they threw rocks onto the house, shot the dog, and then the boy. All while on private property they had no warrant to be on. Randy Weaver never fired a shot at anybody or anything. And as was revealed, the Marshals were the first to fire, which caused this entire incident! All over a bench warrant caused by a summons to appear with an incorrect (later) court date. Randy Weaver was odd. His wife was probably nutty. The dog and the boy were killed while justifiably defending themselves. And they were all living out in the middle of nowhere where odd, nutty people absolutely belong. I think it's likely there are people on this forum who delight in straw-manning Randy Weaver, and those like him, who have broken more serious laws than Randy Weaver and his entire family combined. In current terminology, this entire incident is even worse than what is known as a SWATting. [/QUOTE]

Verification