Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Members Sold Out by TU
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BigUnionGuy" data-source="post: 4968154" data-attributes="member: 4992"><p>I can see that happening.</p><p></p><p>The 43 committee's docket is full and the NAC was done hearing their cases.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I find it hard to believe any panel member would deliberately tank the case for political gain.</p><p></p><p>Did they actually docket all 150 cases, or use one as the pilot ?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This is a bizarre situation. Any more speculation on my part.... would be just that.... speculation.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I respect both [USER=42554]@104Feeder[/USER] and [USER=14176]@Bubblehead[/USER].</p><p></p><p>So, I'm out.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BigUnionGuy, post: 4968154, member: 4992"] I can see that happening. The 43 committee's docket is full and the NAC was done hearing their cases. I find it hard to believe any panel member would deliberately tank the case for political gain. Did they actually docket all 150 cases, or use one as the pilot ? This is a bizarre situation. Any more speculation on my part.... would be just that.... speculation. I respect both [USER=42554]@104Feeder[/USER] and [USER=14176]@Bubblehead[/USER]. So, I'm out. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Members Sold Out by TU
Top