Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Members Sold Out by TU
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Inthegame" data-source="post: 4990323" data-attributes="member: 37112"><p>Subcontracting language has remained mostly unchanged for decades.</p><p></p><p>Probably a few thousand cases across the regions, many successfully before the union side lost their minds. </p><p></p><p>That's an off base and reckless supposition. His BA may have presented a flawless case. We don't know. We do know the Company <strong>always</strong> twist facts with little consequence.</p><p></p><p>Over the years, for inexplicable reasons, the company has convinced too many panels of their inability to staff their operations properly. And far too many union chairs have been complicit in this charade. Lack of staffing causes nearly all the issues our members find distasteful, from 9.5 abuses, the 22.4 poop sandwich, double shifting, forced holiday/weekend work, expanded HOS etc... not to mention the detrimental effects on H&W and Pension plans.</p><p></p><p>So when competing slates promise relief, and a prominent slate member chairs a panel to address a very real problem, the frustration is legit, especially since the decision was without explanation. Not a good look from JW, and it wouldn't be a good look from any chair on the Vairma slate. </p><p></p><p> Hard to follow leaders when they're not out front.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Inthegame, post: 4990323, member: 37112"] Subcontracting language has remained mostly unchanged for decades. Probably a few thousand cases across the regions, many successfully before the union side lost their minds. That's an off base and reckless supposition. His BA may have presented a flawless case. We don't know. We do know the Company [B]always[/B] twist facts with little consequence. Over the years, for inexplicable reasons, the company has convinced too many panels of their inability to staff their operations properly. And far too many union chairs have been complicit in this charade. Lack of staffing causes nearly all the issues our members find distasteful, from 9.5 abuses, the 22.4 poop sandwich, double shifting, forced holiday/weekend work, expanded HOS etc... not to mention the detrimental effects on H&W and Pension plans. So when competing slates promise relief, and a prominent slate member chairs a panel to address a very real problem, the frustration is legit, especially since the decision was without explanation. Not a good look from JW, and it wouldn't be a good look from any chair on the Vairma slate. Hard to follow leaders when they're not out front. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Members Sold Out by TU
Top