Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Members Sold Out by TU
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="104Feeder" data-source="post: 5026252" data-attributes="member: 42554"><p>The language is clear and unambiguous, JW brought up past practice.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I am not a B.A.</p><p></p><p></p><p>The B.A. addressed the change of exhibits in rebuttal as I have previously stated.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Correct. JW in the call asks "which executive session?" which is why it's either gross incompetence or corruption. </p><p></p><p>I know this from my B.A. JW did not. Perhaps he was not 'all there'???</p><p></p><p>Correct, on the phone. I record all my calls.</p><p></p><p>To deflect and cover it seems.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I am tremendously good at applying pressure when motivated.</p><p></p><p>No, he provided more questions than answers.</p><p></p><p></p><p>The facts were no different than thousands of other subcontracting cases that led to a break in the 10 year hiring freeze in 2005, paid at 10 hours, or have been sitting in 'committee hold' waiting to be paid or arbitrated. Please state specifically what facts were bad. We had a subcontractor performing BU work that a member asked to do and no bench because of decades of understaffing. Why don't you state the facts the Company changed? </p><p></p><p>JW offered to have them contact me but to date has not come through. Regardless, the Chair makes the decision, the other members are only advisors. Why does it seem you have a suspiciously close relationship to this case, having alluded to being there? I'm available anytime.</p><p></p><p>Incorrect. Feel free to provide the information to me.</p><p></p><p>JW's name is on the decision. JW is the Chair. He chose to deny instead of deadlock.</p><p></p><p>I have no idea and my BA didn't know who JW was until after the decision. Neither did I. political decision and that is just plain wrong on any level. JW has proven to have an inadequate grasp of the facts and how the hearing transpired.</p><p></p><p>We have complained about those for years. We understand the huge monetary value and are more looking at getting more Feeder drivers trained which had been happening on a regular basis until they announced a freeze immediately following this decision. Those grievances were still in play, now thanks to JW they are in doubt and so are hundreds of Feeder jobs in Local 104. </p><p>Now let me ask you something. I don't know JW. I had never even heard of him before this decision came out. This decision has directly harmed my members. Is it really worth it to you to defend this incompetent, corrupt pos knowing all this? How do you stand for someone like that on your Slate? Do you honestly believe I would do the same if the situation were flipped and someone from my Local had harmed your members? How do you defend denying our grievance after the JALM and West deadlocked it? Wouldn't the logical decision be to deadlock these to arbitration? We would have even accepted committee hold. </p><p>I just wonder how you, JW, and all the blind defenders live with yourselves. I'd walk before I would sell out one Teamster member anywhere. People are corruptible, people are incompetent. It's what we do when we are shown incompetence and corruption that tells us who we are.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="104Feeder, post: 5026252, member: 42554"] The language is clear and unambiguous, JW brought up past practice. I am not a B.A. The B.A. addressed the change of exhibits in rebuttal as I have previously stated. Correct. JW in the call asks "which executive session?" which is why it's either gross incompetence or corruption. I know this from my B.A. JW did not. Perhaps he was not 'all there'??? Correct, on the phone. I record all my calls. To deflect and cover it seems. I am tremendously good at applying pressure when motivated. No, he provided more questions than answers. The facts were no different than thousands of other subcontracting cases that led to a break in the 10 year hiring freeze in 2005, paid at 10 hours, or have been sitting in 'committee hold' waiting to be paid or arbitrated. Please state specifically what facts were bad. We had a subcontractor performing BU work that a member asked to do and no bench because of decades of understaffing. Why don't you state the facts the Company changed? JW offered to have them contact me but to date has not come through. Regardless, the Chair makes the decision, the other members are only advisors. Why does it seem you have a suspiciously close relationship to this case, having alluded to being there? I'm available anytime. Incorrect. Feel free to provide the information to me. JW's name is on the decision. JW is the Chair. He chose to deny instead of deadlock. I have no idea and my BA didn't know who JW was until after the decision. Neither did I. political decision and that is just plain wrong on any level. JW has proven to have an inadequate grasp of the facts and how the hearing transpired. We have complained about those for years. We understand the huge monetary value and are more looking at getting more Feeder drivers trained which had been happening on a regular basis until they announced a freeze immediately following this decision. Those grievances were still in play, now thanks to JW they are in doubt and so are hundreds of Feeder jobs in Local 104. Now let me ask you something. I don't know JW. I had never even heard of him before this decision came out. This decision has directly harmed my members. Is it really worth it to you to defend this incompetent, corrupt pos knowing all this? How do you stand for someone like that on your Slate? Do you honestly believe I would do the same if the situation were flipped and someone from my Local had harmed your members? How do you defend denying our grievance after the JALM and West deadlocked it? Wouldn't the logical decision be to deadlock these to arbitration? We would have even accepted committee hold. I just wonder how you, JW, and all the blind defenders live with yourselves. I'd walk before I would sell out one Teamster member anywhere. People are corruptible, people are incompetent. It's what we do when we are shown incompetence and corruption that tells us who we are. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Members Sold Out by TU
Top