Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="vantexan" data-source="post: 5449136" data-attributes="member: 24302"><p>Baloney.&nbsp; The Washington Free Beacon funded opposition research that had nothing to do with what Steele came up with in his dossier that the Clinton campaign paid for.&nbsp; Which has already been shown through I believe Brennan&#039;s notes that the Democratic administration was informed that the Clinton campaign had come up with.&nbsp; Hillary wanted to divert attention from her private server scandal and it blew up into a life of its own with her backing it for 5+ years now.&nbsp; And what does all that other have to do with Hillary&#039;s campaign dividing the country for years?&nbsp; Are you saying that the end justifies the means?&nbsp; A lot of votes in the midterms went to the Dems because of last minute fear mongering.&nbsp; Y&#039;all claimed the Republicans were going to end Social Security and Medicare, that democracy would end.&nbsp; Even saw one guy say Democrat children would be executed.&nbsp; It&#039;s ridiculous.&nbsp; What matters and always has is who controls the money and how it flows.&nbsp; And who makes bank in how it flows.&nbsp; Let me ask you, do you think Democrats being in bed with Wall Street and the military/industrial complex to keep us involved in wars is ok as long as they throw money at the masses(student loan relief for example)?&nbsp; I don&#039;t want Republicans involved in that and to his credit Trump didn&#039;t get us involved in another war.&nbsp; His seeking to withdraw us from Afghanistan is a major reason I believe why the Washington establishment worked so hard to get rid of him.&nbsp; Make no mistake about it, Trump has a grating personality.&nbsp; But he also was working towards making the U.S. free of international conflicts as much as possible plus trying to make us fuel independent and economically viable.&nbsp; He wasn&#039;t perfect but name another president who attempted to do what he was doing and were their efforts leading us to economic and military security?</p></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="vantexan, post: 5449136, member: 24302"] Baloney. The Washington Free Beacon funded opposition research that had nothing to do with what Steele came up with in his dossier that the Clinton campaign paid for. Which has already been shown through I believe Brennan's notes that the Democratic administration was informed that the Clinton campaign had come up with. Hillary wanted to divert attention from her private server scandal and it blew up into a life of its own with her backing it for 5+ years now. And what does all that other have to do with Hillary's campaign dividing the country for years? Are you saying that the end justifies the means? A lot of votes in the midterms went to the Dems because of last minute fear mongering. Y'all claimed the Republicans were going to end Social Security and Medicare, that democracy would end. Even saw one guy say Democrat children would be executed. It's ridiculous. What matters and always has is who controls the money and how it flows. And who makes bank in how it flows. Let me ask you, do you think Democrats being in bed with Wall Street and the military/industrial complex to keep us involved in wars is ok as long as they throw money at the masses(student loan relief for example)? I don't want Republicans involved in that and to his credit Trump didn't get us involved in another war. His seeking to withdraw us from Afghanistan is a major reason I believe why the Washington establishment worked so hard to get rid of him. Make no mistake about it, Trump has a grating personality. But he also was working towards making the U.S. free of international conflicts as much as possible plus trying to make us fuel independent and economically viable. He wasn't perfect but name another president who attempted to do what he was doing and were their efforts leading us to economic and military security? [/QUOTE]

Verification