Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Babagounj" data-source="post: 972562" data-attributes="member: 12952">tos, bhos decided which dealerships were to close, many of them were family owned and making profits. Today they are either gone ( along with all the jobs they provided ) or have scaled back their operations to selling used cars and repair services.Romney had nothing to do with the auto bailouts.I recall years past when Chrysler first went looking for a gov&#039;t bailout. The debate was on going for months. Not so under bhos, he did it in a matter of weeks.&nbsp; He changed the rules of law to screw the bondholders ( many who were not corporations ) so that they got nothing for their investment. And the UAW ( a union ) became the major shareholder in the new companies.Part of the reason why these companies failed was the crazy union rules in place.So now the foxes rule the chicken house.How those Volts selling ? Its really getting close to becoming the new Edsel.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Babagounj, post: 972562, member: 12952"] tos, bhos decided which dealerships were to close, many of them were family owned and making profits. Today they are either gone ( along with all the jobs they provided ) or have scaled back their operations to selling used cars and repair services. Romney had nothing to do with the auto bailouts. I recall years past when Chrysler first went looking for a gov't bailout. The debate was on going for months. Not so under bhos, he did it in a matter of weeks. He changed the rules of law to screw the bondholders ( many who were not corporations ) so that they got nothing for their investment. And the UAW ( a union ) became the major shareholder in the new companies. Part of the reason why these companies failed was the crazy union rules in place. So now the foxes rule the chicken house. How those Volts selling ? Its really getting close to becoming the new Edsel. [/QUOTE]

Verification