Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
More Completely Legal Election Fortification
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="zubenelgenubi" data-source="post: 5097044" data-attributes="member: 63706"><p>Lol. The AG said there was no evidence of voter fraud, er, widespread voter fraud, er, enough voter fraud to overturn the election. Though he never did do an investigation, so it's an interesting claim, to say the least.</p><p></p><p>Of course recounts of fraudulent votes are going to come up more or less the same. How many signature match verifications were conducted? Who fought to prevent them? Why would they try to stop signature match audits?</p><p></p><p>Trump and his attorneys were taken in by bad sources whose goals were to help discredit the legit claims and give the media something to focus on that was easily disproven to distract from the legit claims. Although I don't dismiss the voting machine issues straight out. Why did Maricopa county fight auditing the machines? Why did they delete files before handing the machines over? Why did they fight the audit tooth and nail, obstructing the completely legal audit if there was nothing to hide? Why did they refuse to do signature matches?</p><p></p><p>The lawsuits were "dismissed" based on fake legal doctrines of "standing" and "laches". I can't imagine why judiciaries, who allowed the SOS's of their respective states and democrats to illegally and unconstitutionally alter voting laws via lawsuit settlements, wouldn't want to try cases that would call into question their legitimacy. </p><p></p><p>You guys are going to have to do better than repeating year old mefia talking points that were absurd when they first started spreading them.</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]362845[/ATTACH]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="zubenelgenubi, post: 5097044, member: 63706"] Lol. The AG said there was no evidence of voter fraud, er, widespread voter fraud, er, enough voter fraud to overturn the election. Though he never did do an investigation, so it's an interesting claim, to say the least. Of course recounts of fraudulent votes are going to come up more or less the same. How many signature match verifications were conducted? Who fought to prevent them? Why would they try to stop signature match audits? Trump and his attorneys were taken in by bad sources whose goals were to help discredit the legit claims and give the media something to focus on that was easily disproven to distract from the legit claims. Although I don't dismiss the voting machine issues straight out. Why did Maricopa county fight auditing the machines? Why did they delete files before handing the machines over? Why did they fight the audit tooth and nail, obstructing the completely legal audit if there was nothing to hide? Why did they refuse to do signature matches? The lawsuits were "dismissed" based on fake legal doctrines of "standing" and "laches". I can't imagine why judiciaries, who allowed the SOS's of their respective states and democrats to illegally and unconstitutionally alter voting laws via lawsuit settlements, wouldn't want to try cases that would call into question their legitimacy. You guys are going to have to do better than repeating year old mefia talking points that were absurd when they first started spreading them. [ATTACH type="full"]362845[/ATTACH] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
More Completely Legal Election Fortification
Top