Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
More Completely Legal Election Fortification
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="zubenelgenubi" data-source="post: 5098760" data-attributes="member: 63706"><p>No, your example is a seemingly baseless fishing expedition. Signature matches are a specific request, done routinely in audits. Signature match verification was how Obama disqualified his competition for the Illinois Senate seat. Newsom's recall petitions were signature matched. So why fight the signature matches in this situation?</p><p></p><p>We also know why they fought the release of equipment for auditing. The recovered files that were illegally deleted showed massive issues with the voters rolls. But, hey, let's distract from those facts by using very weak innuendo that the mefia audience will accept completely and without question to use to call into question the legitimately proven fraud.</p><p></p><p>I also didn't claim the things I was questioning were evidence of fraud. It's fine if you want to use someone's own logic against them, but when you strawman their arguments it just makes you look desperate.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="zubenelgenubi, post: 5098760, member: 63706"] No, your example is a seemingly baseless fishing expedition. Signature matches are a specific request, done routinely in audits. Signature match verification was how Obama disqualified his competition for the Illinois Senate seat. Newsom's recall petitions were signature matched. So why fight the signature matches in this situation? We also know why they fought the release of equipment for auditing. The recovered files that were illegally deleted showed massive issues with the voters rolls. But, hey, let's distract from those facts by using very weak innuendo that the mefia audience will accept completely and without question to use to call into question the legitimately proven fraud. I also didn't claim the things I was questioning were evidence of fraud. It's fine if you want to use someone's own logic against them, but when you strawman their arguments it just makes you look desperate. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
More Completely Legal Election Fortification
Top