Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
More Global Warming
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="wkmac" data-source="post: 872545" data-attributes="member: 2189"><p>The real question would be, would man "allow" god to lift it after man had cut and carved the rock into a god image, sanctified it as holy and therefore moving it would violate creed and dogma?</p><p></p><p><img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/FeltTip/happy-very.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":happy-very:" title="Happy Very :happy-very:" data-shortname=":happy-very:" /></p><p></p><p>As to the smelt, smelt is what some might call a bait fish. It's mainly in the foodchain for salmon and trout. They spawn in late spring and live a year mostly in the delta region where salt and fresh water merge and then return to spawn and die in the backwaters of the fresh water tributaries to the delta region. Unfortunately industrial food farming blasts the soil so much with petro chemicals and such that the soil itself over time begins to lose it's water retention abilities. It thus take large volumes of continuous watering to grow crops and thus the American heartland are depleting the aquifers and other water resources. Even if you sacrifice the smelt now for this farming approach, it's not sustainable and at some point in the future the current industrial farming methods will crash anyway. Killing the smelt will deplete a segment of the foodchain for salmon and trout and thus a potential food source for man could also be adversely effected at the same time as the depleting effects of industrial farming begin to accelerate.</p><p></p><p>Saving the smelt is also about saving the farm as well.</p><p></p><p>[video=youtube;sYWYU5V8JOo]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sYWYU5V8JOo[/video]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="wkmac, post: 872545, member: 2189"] The real question would be, would man "allow" god to lift it after man had cut and carved the rock into a god image, sanctified it as holy and therefore moving it would violate creed and dogma? :happy-very: As to the smelt, smelt is what some might call a bait fish. It's mainly in the foodchain for salmon and trout. They spawn in late spring and live a year mostly in the delta region where salt and fresh water merge and then return to spawn and die in the backwaters of the fresh water tributaries to the delta region. Unfortunately industrial food farming blasts the soil so much with petro chemicals and such that the soil itself over time begins to lose it's water retention abilities. It thus take large volumes of continuous watering to grow crops and thus the American heartland are depleting the aquifers and other water resources. Even if you sacrifice the smelt now for this farming approach, it's not sustainable and at some point in the future the current industrial farming methods will crash anyway. Killing the smelt will deplete a segment of the foodchain for salmon and trout and thus a potential food source for man could also be adversely effected at the same time as the depleting effects of industrial farming begin to accelerate. Saving the smelt is also about saving the farm as well. [video=youtube;sYWYU5V8JOo]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sYWYU5V8JOo[/video] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
More Global Warming
Top