Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Mugarolla" data-source="post: 1609266" data-attributes="member: 8481">It&#039;s not a sense of entitlement. Any company in CS who has paid their liability should be the last ones cut. UPS is not the only company that has. UPS retirees should not be the only ones receiving little, if any cuts.The cuts should come from retirees whose company never met their full pension obligation.It would be like asking you to take a pay cut and send that money to a local that is financially strapped.Your local did it&#039;s fudiciary responsibility, so why should you take a cut because some other local did not.Why should we, and not just UPS, take a cut just because half the companies in CS went bankrupt?The first, and steepest cuts, should be from these defunct company retirees.I know, it is. But how much? I see them &quot;spreading the wealth.&quot;And then if more cuts are needed, come see the companies that don&#039;t owe CS billions.And yes, I&#039;m mugin&#039; your bugin&#039;</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Mugarolla, post: 1609266, member: 8481"] It's not a sense of entitlement. Any company in CS who has paid their liability should be the last ones cut. UPS is not the only company that has. UPS retirees should not be the only ones receiving little, if any cuts. The cuts should come from retirees whose company never met their full pension obligation. It would be like asking you to take a pay cut and send that money to a local that is financially strapped. Your local did it's fudiciary responsibility, so why should you take a cut because some other local did not. Why should we, and not just UPS, take a cut just because half the companies in CS went bankrupt? The first, and steepest cuts, should be from these defunct company retirees. I know, it is. But how much? I see them "spreading the wealth." And then if more cuts are needed, come see the companies that don't owe CS billions. And yes, I'm mugin' your bugin' [/QUOTE]

Verification