Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="LarryBird" data-source="post: 4092630" data-attributes="member: 76548">Do you realize what kind of idiot you sound like?You are condemning the report, although you have no idea what is contained in said report. Yet, in other instances, when you find it convenient to your viewpoint, you cite this report to further your opinions. Which again, since you&#039;re unfamiliar with the exact language contained in the report is truly asinine - you cannot pick and choose and distort the words of Bob Mueller&#039;s report when his investigation serves you, and discredit or ignore it, when it does not.As an American taxpayer, which you sort of were during the bulk of the investigation/currently are again in the present day, you should be interested in it&#039;s contents. We paid for it. Like it, and it&#039;s contents, or not, the report speaks for itself, if you&#039;re so inclined to read it. I think you&#039;d find that it&#039;s not liberal or conservative in it&#039;s nature, but rather a legal opinion based on the laws of our country - something that the gop once claimed to hold so dear, but obviously that was all bull<img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/group1/censored2.gif"&nbsp; class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":censored2:" title="Censored2&nbsp; &nbsp; :censored2:" data-shortname=":censored2:" />, as we&#039;ve found out the past 3 years.The Mueller report isn&#039;t exactly something we democrats love, and it&#039;s certainly not beloved by republicans either - which is exactly what the independent prosecutor should hope for, because it means his investigation was down the middle, and no side was favored or claims total victory in this tussle. Democrats are left thinking he didn’t go far enough or make a clear decision, and Republicans are left thinking Mueller&#039;s restraint isn&#039;t quite the exoneration they&#039;d hoped for, or that it means his investigation was bogus from the start. So it&#039;s not exactly satisfying for anyone, and that&#039;s probably the sad truth about these investigations - both sides are left wanting more, for very different reasons.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="LarryBird, post: 4092630, member: 76548"] Do you realize what kind of idiot you sound like? You are condemning the report, although you have no idea what is contained in said report. Yet, in other instances, when you find it convenient to your viewpoint, you cite this report to further your opinions. Which again, since you're unfamiliar with the exact language contained in the report is truly asinine - you cannot pick and choose and distort the words of Bob Mueller's report when his investigation serves you, and discredit or ignore it, when it does not. As an American taxpayer, which you sort of were during the bulk of the investigation/currently are again in the present day, you should be interested in it's contents. We paid for it. Like it, and it's contents, or not, the report speaks for itself, if you're so inclined to read it. I think you'd find that it's not liberal or conservative in it's nature, but rather a legal opinion based on the laws of our country - something that the gop once claimed to hold so dear, but obviously that was all bull:censored:, as we've found out the past 3 years. The Mueller report isn't exactly something we democrats love, and it's certainly not beloved by republicans either - which is exactly what the independent prosecutor should hope for, because it means his investigation was down the middle, and no side was favored or claims total victory in this tussle. Democrats are left thinking he didn’t go far enough or make a clear decision, and Republicans are left thinking Mueller's restraint isn't quite the exoneration they'd hoped for, or that it means his investigation was bogus from the start. So it's not exactly satisfying for anyone, and that's probably the sad truth about these investigations - both sides are left wanting more, for very different reasons. [/QUOTE]

Verification