Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
The Competition
FedEx Discussions
Need Help with Fed Ex policy in 90's
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JK111" data-source="post: 1114855" data-attributes="member: 46815"><p>Mr. Fed Ex, your idea on Craigs list is good. Thank you. Again, it's not something that puts anyone in any jeopardy, it's simply a two paragraph declaration saying in '1991 I recall the actual delivery routine to be....' that's it. I do agree that if someone is active Fed Ex no reason to get involved but outside of that it is NOT a big deal at all. We just need to find a former Fed Exer from that time period which is not easy to do. The case is NOT about Fed Ex and has NOTHING TO DO WITH FED EX. This is just a comment on showing that a package going to an address does not mean the addressee was in CA to receive the package. THAT'S ALL. I just need someone to tell how it goes. The case is 17 years old and fascinating. Happy to disclose case caption to anyone who is even interested. They will understand that it is about a landmark residency case and NOT ANYTHING to do with Fed Ex. Thanks in advance if anyone is interested. Let me know. </p><p></p><p>Mr. Fed Ex or Richochet1a?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JK111, post: 1114855, member: 46815"] Mr. Fed Ex, your idea on Craigs list is good. Thank you. Again, it's not something that puts anyone in any jeopardy, it's simply a two paragraph declaration saying in '1991 I recall the actual delivery routine to be....' that's it. I do agree that if someone is active Fed Ex no reason to get involved but outside of that it is NOT a big deal at all. We just need to find a former Fed Exer from that time period which is not easy to do. The case is NOT about Fed Ex and has NOTHING TO DO WITH FED EX. This is just a comment on showing that a package going to an address does not mean the addressee was in CA to receive the package. THAT'S ALL. I just need someone to tell how it goes. The case is 17 years old and fascinating. Happy to disclose case caption to anyone who is even interested. They will understand that it is about a landmark residency case and NOT ANYTHING to do with Fed Ex. Thanks in advance if anyone is interested. Let me know. Mr. Fed Ex or Richochet1a? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
The Competition
FedEx Discussions
Need Help with Fed Ex policy in 90's
Top