Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
New Contract 9.5 Question
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Bubblehead" data-source="post: 1584301" data-attributes="member: 14176"><p>It is NOT...in the right place and I'll tell you why.</p><p>The system in place is designed to play out over multiple grievances in a 5 month period.</p><p>It makes no sense to allow the company "a bite of the apple" twice a year.</p><p>Why not opt-in until you opt-out?</p><p>The way I read it, this system isn't designed to be a vehicle to enable an employee to make extra money, rather an avenue to control unwanted OT.</p><p>While I can see why the powers that be would want to protect against employees flip flopping back and forth from on the list to off the list, but why not have it where once you're on the list you stay on for 5 months and beyond until you opt-out?</p><p></p><p>I have nine total 9.5 grievances dating back to the inception of this language in the Central Region and spans over two 5 month periods.</p><p>Not one of them has been paid or even heard at a panel, let alone went before the subsequent committees or Vice Presidents or Union's Co-Chairs as provided for to solve the excessive OT problem.</p><p>There is no way for this language to mesh with snails pace local grievance machinery and panel system in place in my state.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Bubblehead, post: 1584301, member: 14176"] It is NOT...in the right place and I'll tell you why. The system in place is designed to play out over multiple grievances in a 5 month period. It makes no sense to allow the company "a bite of the apple" twice a year. Why not opt-in until you opt-out? The way I read it, this system isn't designed to be a vehicle to enable an employee to make extra money, rather an avenue to control unwanted OT. While I can see why the powers that be would want to protect against employees flip flopping back and forth from on the list to off the list, but why not have it where once you're on the list you stay on for 5 months and beyond until you opt-out? I have nine total 9.5 grievances dating back to the inception of this language in the Central Region and spans over two 5 month periods. Not one of them has been paid or even heard at a panel, let alone went before the subsequent committees or Vice Presidents or Union's Co-Chairs as provided for to solve the excessive OT problem. There is no way for this language to mesh with snails pace local grievance machinery and panel system in place in my state. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
New Contract 9.5 Question
Top