Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
New Social Security bill
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="El Correcto" data-source="post: 3966259" data-attributes="member: 60631"><p>That’s the problem, everyone’s worried about where the roulette ball will land. How many more times are they going to increase the age limit for government retirement, how much will it end up costing the workers to properly fund it as people life expectancy increases. You got to keep in mind social security wasn’t originally planned to subsidize someone for 40 years.</p><p>The average life expectancy was 61 in 1935, people start collecting at 65. That isn’t the case these days, it needs an increased age limit.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Sounds like you’re a proponent of welfare statism when it comes to getting a handout yourself. Yet you don’t have morales behind it, you don’t believe welfare states are good when they don’t directly benefit you and you still have to pick up the tab. You don’t worry about the example the older generations have embraced, our downward spiral into socialism and collectivism. Which is a destructive ideology, eventually you will run out of other’s money then this financial government bubble and artificial standard of living will pop.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="El Correcto, post: 3966259, member: 60631"] That’s the problem, everyone’s worried about where the roulette ball will land. How many more times are they going to increase the age limit for government retirement, how much will it end up costing the workers to properly fund it as people life expectancy increases. You got to keep in mind social security wasn’t originally planned to subsidize someone for 40 years. The average life expectancy was 61 in 1935, people start collecting at 65. That isn’t the case these days, it needs an increased age limit. Sounds like you’re a proponent of welfare statism when it comes to getting a handout yourself. Yet you don’t have morales behind it, you don’t believe welfare states are good when they don’t directly benefit you and you still have to pick up the tab. You don’t worry about the example the older generations have embraced, our downward spiral into socialism and collectivism. Which is a destructive ideology, eventually you will run out of other’s money then this financial government bubble and artificial standard of living will pop. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
New Social Security bill
Top