Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
New Video! Company tries to fire a driver for eating a Pistachio
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Overpaid Union Thug" data-source="post: 4702230" data-attributes="member: 198"><p>Well of course I misunderstood. Because it didn’t make any sense. But your rehash isn’t any better.</p><p></p><p>The law says a waiver can be granted if moving to Mexico (or any other country) would cause extreme hardship to the spouse. Meaning....the U.S. citizen. That can be, but not limited to, financial, medical, eminent danger, etc. </p><p></p><p>Your opinion on whether not that’s valid is irrelevant. What is relevant is the opinion of the immigration officer processing the paper work. And if they know that the alien has a criminal history or ties to gangs/terrorists then they will reject the waiver request regardless of the potential hardships that would occur. She must have had some red flags. </p><p></p><p>Mentioning that and the cancer was relevant for both cases. Especially for proving a hardship for him should he move to Mexico. It was mentioned in regard to his grievance simply to show how heartless UPS can be.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Overpaid Union Thug, post: 4702230, member: 198"] Well of course I misunderstood. Because it didn’t make any sense. But your rehash isn’t any better. The law says a waiver can be granted if moving to Mexico (or any other country) would cause extreme hardship to the spouse. Meaning....the U.S. citizen. That can be, but not limited to, financial, medical, eminent danger, etc. Your opinion on whether not that’s valid is irrelevant. What is relevant is the opinion of the immigration officer processing the paper work. And if they know that the alien has a criminal history or ties to gangs/terrorists then they will reject the waiver request regardless of the potential hardships that would occur. She must have had some red flags. Mentioning that and the cancer was relevant for both cases. Especially for proving a hardship for him should he move to Mexico. It was mentioned in regard to his grievance simply to show how heartless UPS can be. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
New Video! Company tries to fire a driver for eating a Pistachio
Top