Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
New year...new UPS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="soberups" data-source="post: 3906006" data-attributes="member: 14668"><p>Article 37 oversupervision, and also past practice.</p><p>We are required to follow established 340 methods and do our job in a manner that best represents the interest of the company.</p><p>Forced ORION compliance makes following the methods physically impossible. I have 68 pages of 340 methods printed out and I have highlighted literally dozens of them that directly conflict with ORION.</p><p>Being given conflicting instructions, under threat of discipline, is over-supervision. If I violate methods and deliberately waste time and add miles in order to follow ORION, I could be fired.</p><p>The company has a past practice in my building of turning ODO off because they know it does not work. *This is a working condition that they have unilaterally and negatively altered* without any negotiation with the union.</p><p>They know ORION does not work on my route because they have instructed me not to use it, and to use my area knowledge and proper methods in order to service the packages and minimze miles.</p><p>But by intentionally hiding RDO from me and intentionally scrambling the manifest in order to cripple my ability to function, they make it impossible to do the very thing they require me to do.</p><p>That is the very definition of over supervision and harassment.</p><p>They have the right to leave it on and instruct me to follow it 100%, but only if I am absolved of any responsibility for the resulting service failures and methods violations, which of course they will not do.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="soberups, post: 3906006, member: 14668"] Article 37 oversupervision, and also past practice. We are required to follow established 340 methods and do our job in a manner that best represents the interest of the company. Forced ORION compliance makes following the methods physically impossible. I have 68 pages of 340 methods printed out and I have highlighted literally dozens of them that directly conflict with ORION. Being given conflicting instructions, under threat of discipline, is over-supervision. If I violate methods and deliberately waste time and add miles in order to follow ORION, I could be fired. The company has a past practice in my building of turning ODO off because they know it does not work. *This is a working condition that they have unilaterally and negatively altered* without any negotiation with the union. They know ORION does not work on my route because they have instructed me not to use it, and to use my area knowledge and proper methods in order to service the packages and minimze miles. But by intentionally hiding RDO from me and intentionally scrambling the manifest in order to cripple my ability to function, they make it impossible to do the very thing they require me to do. That is the very definition of over supervision and harassment. They have the right to leave it on and instruct me to follow it 100%, but only if I am absolved of any responsibility for the resulting service failures and methods violations, which of course they will not do. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
New year...new UPS
Top