"No evidence"
- Thread starter Tom MacDonald
- Start date
zubenelgenubi
I'm a star
Wow, I'm loving the landslide of ad hominem attacks from the lefties on this thread. Must have no substantial argument, maybe getting a little nervous their guy isn't going to get away with stealing the election? The exact thing they are accusing Trump of trying to do? Hilarious!
If Trump was what all his detractors claim, he would have used the pandemic to force martial law, and cancelled the election entirely. But instead, the democrats, and their allies in the forced narrative media, tried to use the pandemic to further their agenda.
If Trump was what all his detractors claim, he would have used the pandemic to force martial law, and cancelled the election entirely. But instead, the democrats, and their allies in the forced narrative media, tried to use the pandemic to further their agenda.
PT Car Washer
Well-Known Member
Can't blame trumps loss on the left. It was the Republicans that nominated the worse president in history for a second term. Even a lot of Republicans could not vote for him.
BrownFlush
Woke Racist Reigning Ban King
Yeah.. 10 million more than when he won the first time.
floridays
Well-Known Member
Pretty weak, I'd expect more rom a Marine.
zubenelgenubi
I'm a star
Is that the fantasy you guys are hanging on to? Don't let me stand in the way.
fishtm2001
Well-Known Member
The most secure election in American history
fishtm2001
Well-Known Member
PHILADELPHIA (AP) — A federal appeals court in Philadelphia on Friday rejected President Donald Trump’s latest effort to challenge the election results in a case that could reach the U.S. Supreme Court if Trump appeals.
The 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals echoed a string of other courts in finding the Trump campaign offered no evidence of any election fraud. Instead, the court said “the campaign’s claims have no merit.”
“Free, fair elections are the lifeblood of our democracy. Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here,” Judge Stephanos Bibas, a Trump appointee and former law school professor, wrote for the three-judge panel. The court also ordered the Trump campaign to reimburse Pennsylvania for cost of responding to the appeal.
That's nice.
The 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals echoed a string of other courts in finding the Trump campaign offered no evidence of any election fraud. Instead, the court said “the campaign’s claims have no merit.”
“Free, fair elections are the lifeblood of our democracy. Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here,” Judge Stephanos Bibas, a Trump appointee and former law school professor, wrote for the three-judge panel. The court also ordered the Trump campaign to reimburse Pennsylvania for cost of responding to the appeal.
That's nice.
The big package
Well-Known Member
O look , I just got back from having a life and I see a snowflake attack on the President !!! Baby snowflakes have new toys to play with but nobody's paying attention , how sad !!!! 
Tom MacDonald
Max E. Pads
floridays
Well-Known Member
You use your mind.
newfie
Well-Known Member
Pennsylvania State Judge Upholds Halt To Certification, Finds Likelihood Mail-In Balloting Procedures Violate PA Constitution
UPDATE 11-28-2020 7 p.m.: Pennsylvania Supreme Court dismisses challenge to mail-in ballot procedures, vacates halt to certification.
legalinsurrection.com
floridays
Well-Known Member
OuchPennsylvania State Judge Upholds Halt To Certification, Finds Likelihood Mail-In Balloting Procedures Violate PA Constitution
UPDATE 11-28-2020 7 p.m.: Pennsylvania Supreme Court dismisses challenge to mail-in ballot procedures, vacates halt to certification.
You mean the president who got more votes than even your sainted Obama? And please tell me again how a bumbling old racist crook who hardly campaigned managed to get 80 million votes?
Similar threads
