"No evidence"

[It will be fine]

They've reaped that kind of money from being Trump kids? Seems to me they've been in Washington working for Dad the last four years. Please show me where a company is paying Ivanka $83k a month to sit on their board, let alone with no experience like Hunter. Did she start up a little three person firm in a field she has no experience in, fly to a communist country with dad, and secure $1.5 billion in funds from a state owned bank like Hunter did? You seem well versed on the behind the scenes machinations of the Trump family so lay out the graft that has enriched their family in much the same way as the Biden family. Never mind that they have to be the most scrutinized family in the world by the U.S. liberal media. You just lay that egg and the other liberals eat it up like it's obvious.

Ivanka was granted about 30 trademarks in China after Trump’s election. What value do you think those have?

 

[vantexan]

Ivanka was granted about 30 trademarks in China after Trump’s election. What value do you think those have?

Considering the friction between Trump and China not much. Of course the Chinese wanted to curry favor with Trump but it didn't work. And if she has been making money off of that the liberal press would be screaming about it. But here's the big difference. Biden peddled influence through his kid and made money under the table. If you don't think so please explain his multiple high priced mansions on a government salary?

 

[zimbomb]

Considering the friction between Trump and China not much. Of course the Chinese wanted to curry favor with Trump but it didn't work. And if she has been making money off of that the liberal press would be screaming about it. But here's the big difference. Biden peddled influence through his kid and made money under the table. If you don't think so please explain his multiple high priced mansions on a government salary?

Mansions, like this one?

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1317482157812613122

 

[vantexan]

Mansions, like this one?

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1317482157812613122

You tell me. He's supposed to own a handful of very nice homes.

 

[fishtm2001]

"...I’m hearing quite a few people other than Donald Trump try to make the case that the Russia investigation was the Democrats’ version of Trump’s denial of the election results today. That is absurd. First of all, the Russia investigation was initiated by a bunch of Republican G-men, one of whom actually sabotaged Hillary Clinton’s election. In fact, if you asked most Democrats if they blamed James Comey or Vladimir Putin for Clinton’s loss, Comey would win by a mile. After all, he not only sabotaged Clinton he kept the Russia investigation secret during the election!

Virtually no one believed that the votes were changed or that Trump’s election was stolen. We were all very careful to use words like “interference” which is not the same thing at all. The concern was that Trump welcoming interference by a foreign power to help him win was just a teensy bit unethical and it was fair to wonder if some deal had been made to do it. Considering how he is trying to do end runs around the electoral college and use partisan legislators to usurp the will of the voters, I’d say that suspicion was well-founded. The man is a cheater — he’s doing it right now in front of our eyes. The fact that his loss was too big to pull it off doesn’t make him any less of a shameless, conniving fraudster."

Digby

 

[Re-Raise]

"...I’m hearing quite a few people other than Donald Trump try to make the case that the Russia investigation was the Democrats’ version of Trump’s denial of the election results today. That is absurd. First of all, the Russia investigation was initiated by a bunch of Republican G-men, one of whom actually sabotaged Hillary Clinton’s election. In fact, if you asked most Democrats if they blamed James Comey or Vladimir Putin for Clinton’s loss, Comey would win by a mile. After all, he not only sabotaged Clinton he kept the Russia investigation secret during the election!

Virtually no one believed that the votes were changed or that Trump’s election was stolen. We were all very careful to use words like “interference” which is not the same thing at all. The concern was that Trump welcoming interference by a foreign power to help him win was just a teensy bit unethical and it was fair to wonder if some deal had been made to do it. Considering how he is trying to do end runs around the electoral college and use partisan legislators to usurp the will of the voters, I’d say that suspicion was well-founded. The man is a cheater — he’s doing it right now in front of our eyes. The fact that his loss was too big to pull it off doesn’t make him any less of a shameless, conniving fraudster."

Digby

Exactly!

 

[vantexan]

Exactly!

Y'all are in luck! Turns out about two weeks before the election AG Barr designated Federal prosecutor John Durham a Special Counsel. That way if a new administration comes in he's protected from being fired so that he can continue his investigation into the origins of the Russian collusion narrative. Criminal investigation, with the same protections afforded other Special Counsels like Bob Mueller. Should be interesting.

 

[El Correcto]

"...I’m hearing quite a few people other than Donald Trump try to make the case that the Russia investigation was the Democrats’ version of Trump’s denial of the election results today. That is absurd. First of all, the Russia investigation was initiated by a bunch of Republican G-men, one of whom actually sabotaged Hillary Clinton’s election. In fact, if you asked most Democrats if they blamed James Comey or Vladimir Putin for Clinton’s loss, Comey would win by a mile. After all, he not only sabotaged Clinton he kept the Russia investigation secret during the election!

Virtually no one believed that the votes were changed or that Trump’s election was stolen. We were all very careful to use words like “interference” which is not the same thing at all. The concern was that Trump welcoming interference by a foreign power to help him win was just a teensy bit unethical and it was fair to wonder if some deal had been made to do it. Considering how he is trying to do end runs around the electoral college and use partisan legislators to usurp the will of the voters, I’d say that suspicion was well-founded. The man is a cheater — he’s doing it right now in front of our eyes. The fact that his loss was too big to pull it off doesn’t make him any less of a shameless, conniving fraudster."

Digby

You really think comey is a republican g man?
Are you an absolute negative IQ ReRE?

 

[Re-Raise]

Y'all are in luck! Turns out about two weeks before the election AG Barr designated Federal prosecutor John Durham a Special Counsel. That way if a new administration comes in he's protected from being fired so that he can continue his investigation into the origins of the Russian collusion narrative. Criminal investigation, with the same protections afforded other Special Counsels like Bob Mueller. Should be interesting.

Who gives a sht? Good lord do you have a life?

 

[vantexan]

Who gives a sht? Good lord do you have a life?

Wait a minute, y'all can post the above but I can't? To quote a forum local... "are you skeert?"

 

[Re-Raise]

Wait a minute, y'all can post the above but I can't? To quote a forum local... "are you skeert?"

No! They aren’t investigating me! You are a lot more invested personally into this sht than I am

 

[vantexan]

No! They aren’t investigating me! You are a lot more invested personally into this sht than I am

Yep, ur skeert.

 

[Re-Raise]

Yep, ur skeert.

k