Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Obama bad for business
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="The Other Side" data-source="post: 875421" data-attributes="member: 17969"><p>First let me offer this token of my appreciation for the post.</p><p><img src="http://www.foodsubs.com/Photos/saltines.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></p><p></p><p>Now, lets examine what you posted. YOU SAID <span style="font-size: 15px"><strong>"Obama's new policy to crush small business..........." </strong></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"><span style="font-size: 12px">Did you actually read the regulation before you posted this? Or does Town hall do the thinking for you? I read the article you posted from Town Hall and its garbage. It miscontrues the regulation and mis-informs people like you who copy and paste it to blogs like this one.</span></span></p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"><span style="font-size: 12px">Here is the abstraction from the regulation first:</span></span></p><p></p><p><strong>Title:</strong> Nondisplacement of Qualified Workers</p><p>Under Service Contracts</p><p></p><p><strong>Abstract:</strong> Executive Order 13495 of January 30,</p><p>2009, Nondisplacement of Qualified Workers Under Service Contracts, establishes</p><p>the policy that Federal service contracts generally include a clause requiring</p><p>the contractor and its subcontractors, under a contract that succeeds a contract</p><p>for the same or similar service at the same location, to offer qualified</p><p>employees (except managerial and supervisory personnel) employed on the</p><p>predecessor contract a right of first refusal to employment under the successor</p><p>contract. The order assigns enforcement responsibility to the Secretary of Labor</p><p>and directs the Secretary, in consultation with the Federal Acquisition</p><p>Regulatory Council, to issue regulations to implement the order.</p><p></p><p>This has NOTHING to do with small business and everything to do with companies who get "goverment contracts". It doesnt mean anything more than those companies who are under a goverment contract for a service who hires a private business on the "original" contract, must offer that work to the original supplier and give them the right to refuse the work before it can go outside and hire another company.</p><p></p><p>So, lets say lockheed gets a contract for missiles and it hires a machine shop here in california to make some parts for those missiles, then, the contract expires and its re-upped with the goverment, and this regulation says lockheed must offer the work to the machine shop first and give them the opportunity to accept or pass on the work before they look for another company.</p><p></p><p>Pretty simple.</p><p></p><p>It has nothing to do with unions, payoffs or anything else sinister as implied in your Town Hall article. The idea is to keep people working and not allow a company to send the work out of the country when the contract expires. </p><p></p><p>I wish you would really sit down and analyze some of the things you say and post. It would sure help you out.</p><p></p><p>Peace.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="The Other Side, post: 875421, member: 17969"] First let me offer this token of my appreciation for the post. [IMG]http://www.foodsubs.com/Photos/saltines.jpg[/IMG] Now, lets examine what you posted. YOU SAID [SIZE=4][B]"Obama's new policy to crush small business..........." [/B] [B][/B] [SIZE=3]Did you actually read the regulation before you posted this? Or does Town hall do the thinking for you? I read the article you posted from Town Hall and its garbage. It miscontrues the regulation and mis-informs people like you who copy and paste it to blogs like this one.[/SIZE][/SIZE] [SIZE=4][SIZE=3][/SIZE][/SIZE] [SIZE=4][SIZE=3]Here is the abstraction from the regulation first:[/SIZE][/SIZE] [B]Title:[/B] Nondisplacement of Qualified Workers Under Service Contracts [B]Abstract:[/B] Executive Order 13495 of January 30, 2009, Nondisplacement of Qualified Workers Under Service Contracts, establishes the policy that Federal service contracts generally include a clause requiring the contractor and its subcontractors, under a contract that succeeds a contract for the same or similar service at the same location, to offer qualified employees (except managerial and supervisory personnel) employed on the predecessor contract a right of first refusal to employment under the successor contract. The order assigns enforcement responsibility to the Secretary of Labor and directs the Secretary, in consultation with the Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council, to issue regulations to implement the order. This has NOTHING to do with small business and everything to do with companies who get "goverment contracts". It doesnt mean anything more than those companies who are under a goverment contract for a service who hires a private business on the "original" contract, must offer that work to the original supplier and give them the right to refuse the work before it can go outside and hire another company. So, lets say lockheed gets a contract for missiles and it hires a machine shop here in california to make some parts for those missiles, then, the contract expires and its re-upped with the goverment, and this regulation says lockheed must offer the work to the machine shop first and give them the opportunity to accept or pass on the work before they look for another company. Pretty simple. It has nothing to do with unions, payoffs or anything else sinister as implied in your Town Hall article. The idea is to keep people working and not allow a company to send the work out of the country when the contract expires. I wish you would really sit down and analyze some of the things you say and post. It would sure help you out. Peace. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Obama bad for business
Top