Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Oil prices
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="brazenbrown" data-source="post: 378765" data-attributes="member: 9007"><p>I thought the trillions of cubic feet of gas reserves were a significant number in itself (notice how you skipped over that) since we're trying to get away from oil....pay attention to the whole picture..<img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/FeltTip/sick.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":sick:" title="Sick :sick:" data-shortname=":sick:" /></p><p> </p><p>Oh by the way you're the one who quoted this: <strong>" In April 2008, the </strong><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Geological_Survey" target="_blank"><strong>United States Geological Survey</strong></a><strong> (USGS) released a report giving a new resource assessment of the </strong><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bakken_Formation" target="_blank"><strong>Bakken Formation</strong></a><strong> underlying portions of Montana and North Dakota. The USGS believes that with new </strong><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Directional_drilling" target="_blank"><strong>horizontal drilling</strong></a><strong> technology there is somewhere between 3.0 and 4.5 billion barrels"</strong></p><p> </p><p>You seem to round off all your oil estimates to the tune of 4.5..hmm.. I'd have to say your sources are flawed, but maybe it's just a coincidence!!<img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/FeltTip/happy-very.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":happy-very:" title="Happy Very :happy-very:" data-shortname=":happy-very:" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="brazenbrown, post: 378765, member: 9007"] I thought the trillions of cubic feet of gas reserves were a significant number in itself (notice how you skipped over that) since we're trying to get away from oil....pay attention to the whole picture..:sick: Oh by the way you're the one who quoted this: [B]" In April 2008, the [/B][URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Geological_Survey"][B]United States Geological Survey[/B][/URL][B] (USGS) released a report giving a new resource assessment of the [/B][URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bakken_Formation"][B]Bakken Formation[/B][/URL][B] underlying portions of Montana and North Dakota. The USGS believes that with new [/B][URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Directional_drilling"][B]horizontal drilling[/B][/URL][B] technology there is somewhere between 3.0 and 4.5 billion barrels"[/B] You seem to round off all your oil estimates to the tune of 4.5..hmm.. I'd have to say your sources are flawed, but maybe it's just a coincidence!!:happy-very: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Oil prices
Top