Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Opinions on the same sex domestic partnership benifit package
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="toonertoo" data-source="post: 323771" data-attributes="member: 1944"><p>I guess I have alot of different feelings on this subject. </p><p>I could care less who sleeps or has a relationship with who for number 1, then I think about how far this could go #2.</p><p>If it was not needed before why is it now #3.</p><p>there were undocumented relationships for years. </p><p>I fear it will get to the point, that only the worker, and not the "family" will be covered.</p><p>For the segment of the society who has this dilemna, I dont think things should change to suit, them. </p><p>I lived with a man who didnt have coverage for years, should UPS cover him, I dont think without a document that he meant to stay with me; the worker, should entitle him to coverage. </p><p>I also think since it is not allowed in most states to recognize a gay union, should it be UPS choice to insure them. I think it was a bad move. If it is recognized as a legal union, then yes, insure them. </p><p>I still dont think it should be recognized, I still dont believe its the same. </p><p>i am not close minded, I just dont see it as the real thing. If it is to you, go for it, but I dont see it as the norm. Nor should you be covered for dallying in things not considered the norm. </p><p>I realize things change in the world, but I dont think this is one. </p><p>People fight long and hard to cover their familes, and you throw this into the mix, Insurance companies see their bottom end imploding. Where does it go from there? We dont know, they dont know. think for awhile we should wait until this issue is addressed and answered before we decide how to respond to it. JMHO</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="toonertoo, post: 323771, member: 1944"] I guess I have alot of different feelings on this subject. I could care less who sleeps or has a relationship with who for number 1, then I think about how far this could go #2. If it was not needed before why is it now #3. there were undocumented relationships for years. I fear it will get to the point, that only the worker, and not the "family" will be covered. For the segment of the society who has this dilemna, I dont think things should change to suit, them. I lived with a man who didnt have coverage for years, should UPS cover him, I dont think without a document that he meant to stay with me; the worker, should entitle him to coverage. I also think since it is not allowed in most states to recognize a gay union, should it be UPS choice to insure them. I think it was a bad move. If it is recognized as a legal union, then yes, insure them. I still dont think it should be recognized, I still dont believe its the same. i am not close minded, I just dont see it as the real thing. If it is to you, go for it, but I dont see it as the norm. Nor should you be covered for dallying in things not considered the norm. I realize things change in the world, but I dont think this is one. People fight long and hard to cover their familes, and you throw this into the mix, Insurance companies see their bottom end imploding. Where does it go from there? We dont know, they dont know. think for awhile we should wait until this issue is addressed and answered before we decide how to respond to it. JMHO [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Opinions on the same sex domestic partnership benifit package
Top