Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Orion Compliance
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="The Other Side" data-source="post: 1296647" data-attributes="member: 17969"><p>NO manager wants to be the first to jump on the grenade that will be a grievance for not following ORION. In an arbitration, the manager would have to admit that the program fails at 100% to perform the job in the best interests of the company. This is required by contract. All employees must "act in the best interests of the business". Article 37 clearly grants this obligation upon the employees.</p><p></p><p>Now, in an arbitration, the company wants to discipline a driver for failure to follow ORION. The employee counters that in his/her experience, ORION does not work in the best interest of the route, customers or the business, and in the drivers analysis using ORION would hurt the business.</p><p></p><p>The company would then have to demonstrate that ORION does in fact work better than the driver can perform the route on his own. </p><p></p><p>Of course, we all now know that ORION fails and the company reduced its expectations to 85% compliance. This in itself is an admission that it doesnt work. </p><p></p><p>Those drivers who have experienced ORION so far, can tell you that following ORION only puts you way behind, has you doubling back on streets you would have finished on one pass, has you leaving streets incomplete to cross town a couple of miles and at the end of the day, increases miles and does not save miles.</p><p></p><p>An Arbitor can look at payroll/WOR just as easy as a manager can, and he can tell the difference between production and going in the hole. An arb can look at "TRACE" or planned day and it can be established that a route is clusterblasted from the jump in the morning.</p><p></p><p>Any two bit business agent could demonstrate that stops are being missed causing delays using all the companys tools.</p><p></p><p>An arb would easily rule that ORION does not allow the driver to comply with article 37 "acting in the best interests of the company".</p><p></p><p>TOS.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="The Other Side, post: 1296647, member: 17969"] NO manager wants to be the first to jump on the grenade that will be a grievance for not following ORION. In an arbitration, the manager would have to admit that the program fails at 100% to perform the job in the best interests of the company. This is required by contract. All employees must "act in the best interests of the business". Article 37 clearly grants this obligation upon the employees. Now, in an arbitration, the company wants to discipline a driver for failure to follow ORION. The employee counters that in his/her experience, ORION does not work in the best interest of the route, customers or the business, and in the drivers analysis using ORION would hurt the business. The company would then have to demonstrate that ORION does in fact work better than the driver can perform the route on his own. Of course, we all now know that ORION fails and the company reduced its expectations to 85% compliance. This in itself is an admission that it doesnt work. Those drivers who have experienced ORION so far, can tell you that following ORION only puts you way behind, has you doubling back on streets you would have finished on one pass, has you leaving streets incomplete to cross town a couple of miles and at the end of the day, increases miles and does not save miles. An Arbitor can look at payroll/WOR just as easy as a manager can, and he can tell the difference between production and going in the hole. An arb can look at "TRACE" or planned day and it can be established that a route is clusterblasted from the jump in the morning. Any two bit business agent could demonstrate that stops are being missed causing delays using all the companys tools. An arb would easily rule that ORION does not allow the driver to comply with article 37 "acting in the best interests of the company". TOS. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Orion Compliance
Top