Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
ORION
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ArcherUTR" data-source="post: 1609636" data-attributes="member: 53175"><p>If that's what you were trying to say, then I am puzzled by your first reply.</p><p></p><p>If anyone can logically/mathematically reduce the Traveling Salesman Problem to a non-exponential problem set, then they will be mathematically and financially sucked off to infinity Mars.</p><p></p><p>What are you trying to say?</p><p></p><p>Also if you are trying to say that ORION can never be more than 85% correct because of the 'equation' (when you really mean an ad-hoc algorithm), then you are wrong on that too.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ArcherUTR, post: 1609636, member: 53175"] If that's what you were trying to say, then I am puzzled by your first reply. If anyone can logically/mathematically reduce the Traveling Salesman Problem to a non-exponential problem set, then they will be mathematically and financially sucked off to infinity Mars. What are you trying to say? Also if you are trying to say that ORION can never be more than 85% correct because of the 'equation' (when you really mean an ad-hoc algorithm), then you are wrong on that too. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
ORION
Top
