Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="brett636" data-source="post: 2227110" data-attributes="member: 249">The question was anything but absurd.&nbsp; It was formed to prove a point that you disagree with so you find it absurd.&nbsp; You answered the question properly by asserting the gun show is the safest place to be, but lets take this a bit further.&nbsp; Instead of focusing on the structures and objects in these two scenarios, lets focus on just the different kinds of people in each.&nbsp; In group A you have people who can be armed to the hilt or not and their threat those around them does not change.&nbsp; While those in group B will sharpen a toothbrush to a razor edge just to slit your throat for fun.&nbsp; The objects each group possesses are meaningless, but what their intents are mean everything.&nbsp; Your &quot;common sense&quot; regulation always targets those in group A who are no threat to you or anyone else while those in group B could care less.&nbsp; Now you may be wondering why I refer to you as part of the &quot;anti-gunner&quot; crowd, and I thoroughly believe you are anti-gun.&nbsp; Your last statement about killing 49 people with fists begs the question how do you think you can get to that point where someone like Omar Mateen only has his fists to carry out a mass murder?&nbsp; Since he purchased the weapons legally then your only answer can be that they should not be for sale which would require the banning of guns.&nbsp; Hence the title &quot;anti-gunner&quot;.&nbsp; I know some of you like to pretend you respect the right to bear arms, but I can see through your charade.&nbsp; With each new tragedy you seek to further limit the right of the people to keep and bear arms(that shall not be infringed) with new regulations until those regulations all but ban private ownership of guns.&nbsp; Thats the goal of a large chunk of liberals including our very own President.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="brett636, post: 2227110, member: 249"] The question was anything but absurd. It was formed to prove a point that you disagree with so you find it absurd. You answered the question properly by asserting the gun show is the safest place to be, but lets take this a bit further. Instead of focusing on the structures and objects in these two scenarios, lets focus on just the different kinds of people in each. In group A you have people who can be armed to the hilt or not and their threat those around them does not change. While those in group B will sharpen a toothbrush to a razor edge just to slit your throat for fun. The objects each group possesses are meaningless, but what their intents are mean everything. Your "common sense" regulation always targets those in group A who are no threat to you or anyone else while those in group B could care less. Now you may be wondering why I refer to you as part of the "anti-gunner" crowd, and I thoroughly believe you are anti-gun. Your last statement about killing 49 people with fists begs the question how do you think you can get to that point where someone like Omar Mateen only has his fists to carry out a mass murder? Since he purchased the weapons legally then your only answer can be that they should not be for sale which would require the banning of guns. Hence the title "anti-gunner". I know some of you like to pretend you respect the right to bear arms, but I can see through your charade. With each new tragedy you seek to further limit the right of the people to keep and bear arms(that shall not be infringed) with new regulations until those regulations all but ban private ownership of guns. Thats the goal of a large chunk of liberals including our very own President. [/QUOTE]

Verification