Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Our CEO
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dfigtree" data-source="post: 168544" data-attributes="member: 5050"><p>JIM MUST GO.</p><p></p><p>Jim will leave after the celebrating is over. Hubris is a cardinal sin. Nonetheless, our CEO is showing he can HUBRIS with the best of the them. The real question is "Why wasn't UPS back dating options?" Heck, everybody was doing it. Was our CFO too stupid or too smart to do that. Now, <em><strong>IF</strong></em> we had back dated options, then JIM would be gone. Scott would be gone. And, probably Dave, too. Our troubles would be over or maybe just beginning. WHO WOULD BE THE REPLACEMENTS?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dfigtree, post: 168544, member: 5050"] JIM MUST GO. Jim will leave after the celebrating is over. Hubris is a cardinal sin. Nonetheless, our CEO is showing he can HUBRIS with the best of the them. The real question is "Why wasn't UPS back dating options?" Heck, everybody was doing it. Was our CFO too stupid or too smart to do that. Now, [I][B]IF[/B][/I] we had back dated options, then JIM would be gone. Scott would be gone. And, probably Dave, too. Our troubles would be over or maybe just beginning. WHO WOULD BE THE REPLACEMENTS? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Our CEO
Top