Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Retirement Topics
Pension Agency Faces a New Front
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ok2bclever" data-source="post: 54929"><p>"other teamsters who leech off UPS dollars" that type of inaccurate drivel does get a pretty good reception here, but it's still inaccurate. </p><p> </p><p>Just like the "IBT will fight tooth and nail. . ." </p><p> </p><p>Try reading the part about UPS and "a large coalition that includes the Teamsters" before spouting the "bad Teamsters" crap. </p><p> </p><p>The Teamsters know that as goes UPS, so goes the Teamsters in this day and age. </p><p> </p><p>It was refreshing to read "has been looking for years for ways to lower its pension costs" very telling and truthful, rather than that "we are concerned about our employees future welfare" pablum we mostly have heard about for the last few years. </p><p> </p><p>The "broader discretion to cut nonbasic retirement benefits" will be something to keep an eye on as far as what this entails. </p><p> </p><p>The "It also would allow UPS to protect its employees from cutbacks if the company would make higher-than-required payments into affected pension plans" seems to lean towards a partitioning move that would favor us. </p><p> </p><p>Say it is so! </p><p> </p><p>Thanks for the info my2cents. </p><p> </p><p>Of course the</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ok2bclever, post: 54929"] "other teamsters who leech off UPS dollars" that type of inaccurate drivel does get a pretty good reception here, but it's still inaccurate. Just like the "IBT will fight tooth and nail. . ." Try reading the part about UPS and "a large coalition that includes the Teamsters" before spouting the "bad Teamsters" crap. The Teamsters know that as goes UPS, so goes the Teamsters in this day and age. It was refreshing to read "has been looking for years for ways to lower its pension costs" very telling and truthful, rather than that "we are concerned about our employees future welfare" pablum we mostly have heard about for the last few years. The "broader discretion to cut nonbasic retirement benefits" will be something to keep an eye on as far as what this entails. The "It also would allow UPS to protect its employees from cutbacks if the company would make higher-than-required payments into affected pension plans" seems to lean towards a partitioning move that would favor us. Say it is so! Thanks for the info my2cents. Of course the [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Retirement Topics
Pension Agency Faces a New Front
Top