Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Petition For Public Release of BHO's Birth Certificate
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Babagounj" data-source="post: 724370" data-attributes="member: 12952"><p><a href="http://homelandsecurityus.com/archives/3735" target="_blank">http://homelandsecurityus.com/archives/3735</a></p><p><strong><a href="http://homelandsecurityus.com/archives/3735" target="_blank">An investigative report detailing the Obama eligibility controversy</a></strong></p><p></p><p><em><strong><a href="mailto:douglas.hagmann@gmail.com"><em><strong>By Douglas J. Hagmann, Director</strong></em></a></strong></em></p><p><em><strong></strong></em>Since the U.S. Constitution was adopted into law, every elected U.S. president who was born after 1787 was born in the United States of parents who were both U.S. citizens <em>except two</em>: <strong>Chester Alan ARTHUR and Barack Hussein OBAMA II</strong>. It is interesting to note that when Chester Alan ARTHUR was born, his father, William ARTHUR was a British subject and not a U.S. citizen. There is ample authenticated historical evidence to substantiate that ARTHUR deliberately and publicly misrepresented his family lineage during his campaign and following his election in 1880 as the 21st President, took steps to destroy evidence, including family and birth records.</p><p> Barack Hussein OBAMA II has publicly admitted that his father was a Kenyan native and a British citizen <strong><em>who never became a U.S. citizen</em></strong>. Based on that admission and further verification of his father’s nationality, OBAMA’s status as a natural born citizen and thus, his eligibility to hold the office of President of the United States is questionable at best, at least according to the aforementioned Supreme Court ruling of <a href="http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=88&invol=162" target="_blank"><em>Minor v. Happersett</em></a>. This issue becomes more prescient and ominously nefarious when one investigates the overt and covert behavior of OBAMA as a candidate, his actions following his election, the duplicity of the media, members of the U.S. Congress, the Federal Elections Commission and other factors by those who appear to be working individually or in concert to purposely misdirect the core Constitutional argument.</p><p> <strong>Is Barack Hussein OBAMA in fact legally eligible, under the United States Constitution, to serve as President of the United States?</strong></p><p>Since its original posting ( the COLB ), numerous individuals and websites have sought to disprove the authenticity of the document, which was posted as an image in JPEG format, through analysis of the image or by other means (e.g. sequencing of certificate numbers, absence of state seal, etc.). Although there appears to be sufficient evidence suggesting the document is <em>not</em> a valid certificate and has been falsely created or the image has been deliberately altered, limiting discussion at this time to the merits of the COLB detracts from a much larger issue: OBAMA’s massive and unprecedented campaign to keep sealed his actual birth certificate (and other relevant records) from public view.</p><p> This is not to say that the publication of the COLB document is unimportant. In fact, quite the opposite is true if the matter of legal eligibility is ever properly and thoroughly investigated by a legitimate court of inquiry within the United States. As agents, representatives or the assigns of Barack Hussein OBAMA have publicly asserted that the question of eligibility has been officially answered by the publication of the COLB as listed on officially sanctioned web sites, <em>and</em> it is ultimately proven that the document is deliberately deceptive by any means, an inquiry into violations of the United States Crimes Code, 18 USC Section 1028 encompassing fraud and other related activity involving identification documents might apply.</p><p>Many who argue that Barack Hussein OBAMA II was born in Hawaii not only point to the COLB as direct evidence of eligibility, but they also point to two separate birth announcements that appear in the <em>Honolulu Sunday Advertiser</em> and the <em>Star-Bulletin</em> in 1961. Those doing so either fail to understand the legal definition of a natural born citizen as it applies to the eligibility factor, or are guilty of intentionally misdirecting the core issue. A birth announcement is simply that – a public announcement that a baby was born. The birth announcements do not provide any information about the child’s citizenship, cannot be authenticated, and hold no weight of evidence to support either side of the eligibility argument.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Babagounj, post: 724370, member: 12952"] [url]http://homelandsecurityus.com/archives/3735[/url] [B][URL="http://homelandsecurityus.com/archives/3735"]An investigative report detailing the Obama eligibility controversy[/URL][/B] [I][B][EMAIL="douglas.hagmann@gmail.com"][I][B]By Douglas J. Hagmann, Director[/B][/I][/EMAIL] [/B][/I]Since the U.S. Constitution was adopted into law, every elected U.S. president who was born after 1787 was born in the United States of parents who were both U.S. citizens [I]except two[/I]: [B]Chester Alan ARTHUR and Barack Hussein OBAMA II[/B]. It is interesting to note that when Chester Alan ARTHUR was born, his father, William ARTHUR was a British subject and not a U.S. citizen. There is ample authenticated historical evidence to substantiate that ARTHUR deliberately and publicly misrepresented his family lineage during his campaign and following his election in 1880 as the 21st President, took steps to destroy evidence, including family and birth records. Barack Hussein OBAMA II has publicly admitted that his father was a Kenyan native and a British citizen [B][I]who never became a U.S. citizen[/I][/B]. Based on that admission and further verification of his father’s nationality, OBAMA’s status as a natural born citizen and thus, his eligibility to hold the office of President of the United States is questionable at best, at least according to the aforementioned Supreme Court ruling of [URL="http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=88&invol=162"][I]Minor v. Happersett[/I][/URL]. This issue becomes more prescient and ominously nefarious when one investigates the overt and covert behavior of OBAMA as a candidate, his actions following his election, the duplicity of the media, members of the U.S. Congress, the Federal Elections Commission and other factors by those who appear to be working individually or in concert to purposely misdirect the core Constitutional argument. [B]Is Barack Hussein OBAMA in fact legally eligible, under the United States Constitution, to serve as President of the United States?[/B] Since its original posting ( the COLB ), numerous individuals and websites have sought to disprove the authenticity of the document, which was posted as an image in JPEG format, through analysis of the image or by other means (e.g. sequencing of certificate numbers, absence of state seal, etc.). Although there appears to be sufficient evidence suggesting the document is [I]not[/I] a valid certificate and has been falsely created or the image has been deliberately altered, limiting discussion at this time to the merits of the COLB detracts from a much larger issue: OBAMA’s massive and unprecedented campaign to keep sealed his actual birth certificate (and other relevant records) from public view. This is not to say that the publication of the COLB document is unimportant. In fact, quite the opposite is true if the matter of legal eligibility is ever properly and thoroughly investigated by a legitimate court of inquiry within the United States. As agents, representatives or the assigns of Barack Hussein OBAMA have publicly asserted that the question of eligibility has been officially answered by the publication of the COLB as listed on officially sanctioned web sites, [I]and[/I] it is ultimately proven that the document is deliberately deceptive by any means, an inquiry into violations of the United States Crimes Code, 18 USC Section 1028 encompassing fraud and other related activity involving identification documents might apply. Many who argue that Barack Hussein OBAMA II was born in Hawaii not only point to the COLB as direct evidence of eligibility, but they also point to two separate birth announcements that appear in the [I]Honolulu Sunday Advertiser[/I] and the [I]Star-Bulletin[/I] in 1961. Those doing so either fail to understand the legal definition of a natural born citizen as it applies to the eligibility factor, or are guilty of intentionally misdirecting the core issue. A birth announcement is simply that – a public announcement that a baby was born. The birth announcements do not provide any information about the child’s citizenship, cannot be authenticated, and hold no weight of evidence to support either side of the eligibility argument. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Petition For Public Release of BHO's Birth Certificate
Top
