Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="trplnkl" data-source="post: 833319" data-attributes="member: 13254">That is a very eloquently written piece of ....fabrication. Sure they are people out there that hate black people, I&#039;m not one of them. I do question his eligibility based on where his father was a citizen, not his race. I would have the same questions if his father was lilly white and born in Ireland. My opposition to 0 is rooted in more than just his &quot;eligibility&quot;, his idea&#039;s of what is good for America, his obvious multiple lies, his lack of leadership and the fact that I believe he is hiding something (no I don&#039;t know what) from the American voters that we should know.&nbsp;I remember the first time I heard him say in a pre-election speech of the transparency that his administration was going to exude. Not only has that not happened but he has gone extra lengths to prevent transparency. A large portion of the health care bill that was rammed through congress, at break neck speed, at his insistence was formulated behind closed doors that only democrats were allowed to go through. That is anything but transparent. That isn&#039;t where the problems with the health care bill end. The health care bill isn&#039;t where the lack of transparency end. Transparency isn&#039;t where my objections to 0 end.&nbsp;I know the usual suspects on here are gonna jump on this and ridicule, call names and sling mud....so be it. What those suspects refuse to recognize is that they are just as biased to the left as they say I am to the right.&nbsp; All of this is to explain why I feel personally insulted by the article from an obvious extreme left source. It is articles like this (and the ones that are reversed from the extreme right) that contribute to my natural cherub like demeanor. <img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/smile.png"&nbsp; class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="trplnkl, post: 833319, member: 13254"] [COLOR=sienna][I][B]That is a very eloquently written piece of ....fabrication. Sure they are people out there that hate black people, I'm not one of them. I do question his eligibility based on where his father was a citizen, not his race. I would have the same questions if his father was lilly white and born in Ireland. My opposition to 0 is rooted in more than just his "eligibility", his idea's of what is good for America, his obvious multiple lies, his lack of leadership and the fact that I believe he is hiding something (no I don't know what) from the American voters that we should know. I remember the first time I heard him say in a pre-election speech of the transparency that his administration was going to exude. Not only has that not happened but he has gone extra lengths to prevent transparency. A large portion of the health care bill that was rammed through congress, at break neck speed, at his insistence was formulated behind closed doors that only democrats were allowed to go through. That is anything but transparent. That isn't where the problems with the health care bill end. The health care bill isn't where the lack of transparency end. Transparency isn't where my objections to 0 end. I know the usual suspects on here are gonna jump on this and ridicule, call names and sling mud....so be it. What those suspects refuse to recognize is that they are just as biased to the left as they say I am to the right. [/B][/I][I][B]All of this is to explain why I feel personally insulted by the article from an obvious extreme left source. It is articles like this (and the ones that are reversed from the extreme right) that contribute to my natural cherub like demeanor. :) [/B][/I][/COLOR] [/QUOTE]

Verification